All anyone really needs to do is read your post to figure out why at this time it makes absolutely zero sense to move Soriano out of the lead off spot with or without the addition of Brian Roberts. That, and what I'm about to add...... Fact: The difference between batting first and batting 6th last year for the Cubs roster was 83 plate appearances. If Roberts was batting 1st and Theriot was batting 2nd and Soriano was 6th behind Lee, Ramirez and Fukudome, do we really want Theriot (the $350K worse OBP than Soriano kid) getting 63 more plate appearances over the course of a season than Soriano? I sure don't. Soriano was a better lead off hitter than Roberts last year, even with a poorer OBP. In another thread, I provided proof that Soriano scores more runs per at bat than Brian Roberts does. Nobody is banishing Roberts to the bottom of the order if Soriano leads off. Right now (and assuming Roberts became a Cub), the most ideal line up that the Cubs could send out there everyday is this: Soriano Roberts Lee Ramirez Fukudome Soto Pie Theriot The best hitters on the team bat the most. Period. I just can't even begin to grasp how anyone could argue this. A Soriano lead off home run with no one on base is WAY, WAY, WAY better than Roberts getting a single and stealing 2nd base and Theriot grounding out to the 2b, even if it advances the runner. Soriano scored a run without any outs occuring. Soriano kept the inning alive, and after 8 more at bats, including at bats by many of the better hitters in the line up, he's due to bat again already. Granted, 7,8,9 in the line up will likely take away RBI opportunities for Soriano batting 1st, but so does taking 83 PA's over the course of a season. And in the later innings, you have guys like DeRosa and Ward and possibly even Murton (all with very respectable OBP's) who can PH for the pitcher and possibly get on base. If Pie and Theriot can improve their OBP's to somewhere in the neighborhood of .330/.340 respectively, combine that with those late inning pinch hitters and voila, an awesome situation for Soriano to not only get the most at bats of any player on the team, but lots of RBI opportunities as well. This really isn't rocket science. It's making the best use of the cards you are dealt. And in no universe I want to be a part of is Ryan Theriot a better top of the order hitter than Soriano. As CCP pointed out, the only real way to move Soriano out of the lead off spot is if you have two top of the order hitters who can outproduce Soriano, or at least 2 top of the order hitters that would make more sense to move Soriano down in the order. There were only a small handful of lead off hitters in baseball last year that were more productive than Soriano, and Brian Roberts wasn't one of them. Only Hanley Ramirez had a better SLG from the lead off spot. Only Curtis Granderson and Hanley had a better OPS from the lead off spot. Several scored more runs than Soriano, but Soriano had way less PA because of injury last year. Even with the injury, Soriano had more home runs, was 2nd in doubles and 3rd in RBI when comparing all the lead off hitters in both leagues. Only Granderson and Rollins had more XBH's than Soriano, but Soriano would have ended up with more of those as well if given a full healthy season. Getting on base is a good thing. No one will argue that. But, a home run is better than a single, a double, a triple, a walk or a HBP. But, Soriano doesn't just hit HR's. He also hits doubles. More doubles than Roberts hits. And Soriano steals bases when his hamstring isn't pissing him off. Bottom line, this isn't about who is a better lead off hitter. It's about putting the best constructed line up on the field, and no matter how you slice it, Soriano/Roberts is WAY better than Roberts/Theriot. In fact, Soriano/Roberts just might be the most productive 1/2 in the entire league. That would be a thing of beauty for Mr. Lee, Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Fukudome.