Actually, Dusty is the manager, not Corey. He could've said no if he wanted to. He should've known not to let a guy who was struggling hit in one of the most crucial on base spots in the line up. I understand his player's manager philosophy, but this is the same thing that happened with Sammy's refusal to move down last year. At some point, Dusty has to put on his manager's hat, and make a decision that's going to benefit the team, not just keep one player happy. Exactly right. If Aramis asked to bat leadoff, what then? What if Barrett wanted to coach third base? Neifi work concessions? Really though, BleedCubbieBlue said it right: it's not a Players' Manager's job to give everyone what they want, it's to keep everybody happy and productive. If Corey wanted to bat leadoff, Dusty should've pulled him aside and given him a "best for the team" talk. Lol! IMO Neifi should be working concessions for the first 7 innings or so. As far as bashing Dusty, he gets criticized because he does not put this team in the best position to win and that's his only job. You play your best players, you don't run your pitchers ragged, you anticipate the opposing team's moves and act accordingly. He does none of those things consistently. That's why people say the cubs are where they are in spite of Dusty not because of him. I mean can you really look back at Dusty's stint in Chicago without saying WTF was he thinking?