Jazz

WTF!!!!!!!! godamnt.

wow, goal line stand by Ore ST on the 1. Crap.

Geovany Soto

sotosotosoto!!!!!!

aim chat = "augielol"

rob is a smart man

ortiz killed that. man lackey getS eaten by the boSox

im sure you recorded some of it, go sifting through your matt murton tribute videos set to nickelback, im sure youll find a snippet of it.

yes, less southern folk and more details of this disney movie worthy affair.

your blowing my mind kid. I dont think i could handle this supposed proof of yours.

"that's the coolest ****** story ever i've heard, do you have time to tell it again?"

alright, I feel like there have been 20 threads just like this in the years this board has existed, and there all going to go the same way, without a clear concise opinion, so its basically split through the middle. My fault i suppose.

CUBS WIN! GO CUBS GO

1-2-3 plz Demp

nice job sam!!

wow blue....

scott eyre trying to eat fuld.

OMG SAMMY FULD!

omg....SORIANO!!!!

riot slap.

starting a new thread so as not to clog up game thread. To refute this, I'm saying that a player's performance does not shift whether or not there is a base runner on or not. The fact that his numbers are different with runners on is all just a matter of coincidence. A player doesn't suddenly gain better offensive ability (or worse), based on the situation at hand, i just cannot believe that theory.

true that. My apologies to those with slower connections.

Soto GS plz

RBI is not meaningless. When it comes to evaluating an individual player's performance, yes, it pretty much is. because the stats show that batters are no better in "clutch" situations than in "nonclutch" situations. http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/6014/situational;_ylt=AiOdIGbve4WS2MzSUeKPdn6FCLcF http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/6014/situational;_ylt=AtxcXjhol3bdxrEebElBtkCFCLcF?year=2006&type=Batting http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/6014/situational;_ylt=Amw.C6HHjgFt5wyeyBBVp1iFCLcF?year=2005&type=Batting http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/6014/situational;_ylt=Aki4QRrJIYdEN9f6.fHIaI.FCLcF?year=2004&type=Batting accept the stats show Aramis is better in clutch situations year after year. It's simply a statistical anomaly. No correlation has ever been shown in any player, ever. It's completely random. Umm, he just showed a direct correlation with Aramis. except once again, its an anomaly. BA with RISP isn't a predictive stat. When you have a guy who is consistently better in certain situations year after year, then yes, you can look at that and logically conclude that it's likely to continue. no. because you cannot logically conclude that hes going to have runners on whenever hes batting. Right now you are arguing that the idea of "clutch" is real. I don't think this game thread is appropriate for this discussion so i'll leave it at that.

funny youd say that right after he walked.