My impression of Barrett when he signed with the Cubs was that he spent a good chunk of 2000 and 2003 banged up, and it impacted his numbers pretty badly. The Cubs were effectively betting that the 'true' Michael Barrett was the .300/.350 guy he showed as a rookie, a converted 3B. He was maturing at the plate and it showed in his increased IsoD numbers his last two seasons with Mtl: the 0.070 IsoD mitigated his poor BA. I wasn't a fan of the MB signing then because I worried more about his defense. That's another topic altogether which has been debated ad nauseum on this board. But offensively he's worked better than almost everyone realistically hoped for back in 04 -- that much is certain. But Izzy's IsoD numbers (presumably the most predictive component of his OBP) are absolutely abysmal by comparison to MB: 0.034, under half of MB's 0.070. No pop in the bat, contrary to what we heard today from some joker on ESPN. So no, I don't think Barrett's situation is really comparable or cause for any hope. Izzy will almost certainly be an anemic bat -- shove him in the 7 or 8 hole and keep expectations rock bottom. In isolation, forgetting the rest of the Cubs' problems, I think there's been too much focus on Izzy's poor offense. My biggest worry about him is his health and how it rates to affect his defense. What is the nature of this 'degenerative arthritic condition'? Does anyone know how this thing plays out over time? If the Cubs miraculously are able to keep ARam AND get at least one more stud for the OF and/or 2B AND sign Jason Schmidt, then I can live with Izzy's poor offense -- IF he really has a good glove and good range.