I agree. Nothing aganist KU fans, but Missouri was ranked higher in all the polls and the BCS than KU, and had a much higher strength of schedule. Something's seriously wrong with this picture. Mizzou shouldn't have played in the big 12 title game. Ended up screwing us over. I'd really, really, really like to know the reasoning behind picking ku over Missouri. I don't know. My reasoning is that a hopeless, sick, two running cards to a straight flush suck out. Missouri had the 26th SOS, beat two teams going to a BCS bowl. Kansas was 109th in SOS, and their best win was against Ok St. Missouri beat KU head to head, and their two losses were to 1 team. What the hell is going on here? I've already said it once, but maybe you missed it. The bowls aren't required to pick the best teams. When it comes to at-large bids, they pick wahtever eligible team they believe will bring them the most money, TV ratings, etc. For whatever reason, the OB thought KU was the better pick. It isn't fair to Mizzou; I'll be the first to admit it. They proved they're the better team. I understand that they aren't required to pick the best teams. However, it's like picking a 3rd best team in the conferece to play in a BCS bowl over a #2 team in the conferece, who will be going to the Cotton Bowl. Think of this message. Great job on finishing 2nd in the conference, but we're picking the 3rd best team. Yes, that team that you just beat a week ago. What kind of a message does that send? I doubt the Orange Bowl cares as long as their pockets get lined.