Jump to content
North Side Baseball

CubinNY

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by CubinNY

  1. He looks like Beltran. Looks like Beltran, hits like Beltran's grandfather.
  2. I thought Hendry use to be a scout? What has Angel Pagen ever done to warrent a roster spot, let alone be considered for a starting postion?
  3. I bet the Padres sign him I do too. Hendry is taking a huge gamble with DeRosa. I hope he pans out.
  4. It's the silly season. Bruce, One question. Do you know if the Cubs have any interest in upgrading at either SS (Izturis) or 2nd (DeRosa/Theriot)? There is a rumor that Marcus Giles might be non-tendered. The Cubs will not look into Marcus Giles if he's non-tendered. They're happy with their infield, as you heard Mr. Hendry say. I kind of figured that. Thanks Bruce!
  5. It's the silly season. Bruce, One question. Do you know if the Cubs have any interest in upgrading at either SS (Izturis) or 2nd (DeRosa/Theriot)? There is a rumor that Marcus Giles might be non-tendered.
  6. Then according to Chris Carpenter's "past performances", http://www.baseball-reference.com/c/carpech01.shtml he would had continue to be a talented, but crappy pitchers. "Past performances" is not the best predictor, because doesn't take into account different variables. It's a definition. You cannot predict by things that have not happened yet. I think what you mean is that there are things beyond stats that can be used to predict, but those are most assuredly still past performance. There is quite literally nothing aside from past performance and wholely irrational beliefs that can be used to predict future performance upside? tools? makeup? what do your base them on? your crazy imagination, or his past performance? What if you're a scout, and a guy has great past numbers, but you go out and see him play somewhere and talk to him and it becomes painfully obvious the man has suffered a mental collapse? Do you still sign him because of his past performance? Or let's say there's a guy who has been pretty mediocre all his minor league career, and you visit him, ask him to get an eye test and he comes back with 20/200 vision? Do you write him off because of past performance? Everything is relative. A player needs to be compared relative to his age and level of compitition.
  7. Mostly because he was injured and missed most of last year. I think it is way, way too early to write off Dopirak. Maybe it's too early, but it's definitely not way, way too early. He turns 23 in a week, and he's had an atrocious minor league career. It would be passable for a slick fielding middle infielder, but he's had only one good season, and that was in low A. He sucked in high A and sucked in AA. It's hard to defend the claim that it was mostly because he was injured last year. His completely healthy FSL numbers would not seem to indicate he was ready to do anything in AA, even if he was healthy. - one way then. I'd like to see him get healthy and see what he can do in Severville this summer. If he posts good numbers I'll be on the Dope dealing bandwgn.
  8. Mostly because he was injured and missed most of last year. I think it is way, way too early to write off Dopirak.
  9. Why are people not talking about Floyd taking ABs away from Murton?
  10. My hope is that the Cubs can stay in contention until late June early July and look to deal some surplus pitching for a decent SS. They are going to have to find OBP somewhere.
  11. What makes you say this? Rothschild hasn't gotten anyone into form on a consistent basis since he's been in Chicago. Dave Duncan and Leo Mazzoni couldn't get him into form, but Rothschild can? Lilly hasn't had a sub 4.00 ERA since 2002 when he only started 16 games. He's a fly ball pitcher in NL Central. The Cubs will have to have everything go right for them for a chance to win the NL Central. Right now they look like a .500 ball club.
  12. Glad to have you on board. Whether I agree or disagree with your argument you always have an encyclopedia of stats to back it. Now give me the juicy numbers on why Marquis sucks, so I can use that in addtition to my "melodramatic posts" 8-) I'll just quote mitchell lichtman at btf. he works for the cardinals (at least i think he still does) yukie, yukie, poo-poo.
  13. I think it was quite possible to go from worst to first. But in my mind we just didn't go about spending a fortune correctly. In fact, the four exact moves I called for in Sept were Soriano (for 2B), Drew, Daisuke and Schmidt. Admittedly, I don't know if was ever possible for us to get Schmidt, but we could have done the other three plus Lilly and not spent a whole lot more money (assuming you account for the posting fee in a different budget, that is). I think that would have put us pretty comfortably #1 in the division and serious WS contenders. Soriano Drew Lee Ramirez Jones Murton Barrett Izzy Z Daisuke Lilly Hill Prior/Miller/et al. I would be a happy camper if that would have happened. Real happy. The only thing I might quibble about is that I don't think the Cubs had the finacial wearwithall to pay the ridicilous posting fee for Daisuke.
  14. Sorry if this has been mentioned already. I'm just back from an X-mas party. How old is Marquis now? He's not been outstanding for at least 5 years. Give me a freaking break. I guess it's fine to be a contrian but at some point it becomes absurd. I think that post of his was sarcasm. Sorry if it was sarcasm. However, Marquis is just another in a long line of "lightning in a bottle" signings by the Cubs. I'm tired of the Cubs mentality, to go with the least worst option. Soriano is not what the Cubs needed. Neither are Lilly, Marquis, Morindini, Blauser, Gieatti, Cey, Scott, and on and on and on.
  15. Sorry if this has been mentioned already. I'm just back from an X-mas party. How old is Marquis now? He's not been outstanding for at least 5 years. Give me a freaking break. I guess it's fine to be a contrian but at some point it becomes absurd.
  16. Cubs sign Maruquis, world peace brakes out all over the planet. Story at 11.
  17. There can't be anymore pressure on Hill that what Dusty and Roschild put on him after he came back up from the AJP/Barrett punch. Hill got tarred, feathered, and sent packing after defending his catcher. Then once he got his chance again Dusty pretty much said it's now or never.
  18. Good points. I have hope Larry will get him ironed out and Lou and Jason won't have a Lou/Dibble round two.
  19. Especially if they are intent in signing the Marquuis' of the pitching world.
  20. In this division, with the Astros regressing and the Cards not improving? No, the Cubs have as good a shot as anyone. In any other division you're right. I would agree. The Cubs may have plenty of question marks, but I can't see anyone in the division that I can point to as better than this team right now either. This is exactly how the Cubs seem to think. They want to compete within the division. I don't give a flying fig what Houston or the rest of the NL Central has done. Wining the divsion only means getting to the playoffs. I'd like for my team that has a top 5 payroll to be a lock to be above .500. I cannot understand how anyone could be happy with the Marquis signing when the Cubs have at least 2 guys under their control for the next two years that can be just as sucky.
  21. The combination of Marquis stubbornous and Lou's tempor should make for some high entertainment next year. I cannot see this ending well. Everything, and I mean everything, is going to have to break right for the Cubs to have a chance next year.
  22. 50,000 Basically, that means the Cubs broke even. $50,000 was what they had to pay Tampa Bay, so they're just getting their money back from the Reds. Consistent with the idea that they were really drafting him for the Reds in the first place. I'm sure there's a gentlemen's agreement in place that, at some time in the future, the Reds would do something similar for the Cubs if the situations are reversed. Otherwise, it would make no sense for the Cubs to help out a division rival without getting anything in return. This is no big deal. If the Reds want him, there is no problem in the Cubs helping them out. It isn't like they gave Pujols to the Reds or anything. This kid has played 15 minor league games this year, and missed the previous three seasons completely. No way he sticks. He didn't miss the two previous seasons. He's been playing in the independent league. I don't know whether he sticks, but he's certianly has enough talent.
  23. I've come to the conclusion that outside of making a lineup card the manager doesn't do much else that is useful. As long as Lou doesn't bat Izturis 2nd, or make some stupid double switch in the 6th or 7th inning I'll be fine. I can remeber from his Reds days that he abhors a pitcher who cannot throw strikes.
×
×
  • Create New...