But he was washed and addicted by 30. I think there are some issues with evaluation and chasing mythical wins. Are starting pitchers more valuable than relievers? Yes, but how much more? it's hard to quantify. If they pitch half a game 2x + how many innings on average more than a reliever - days between appearances? Should they be given more time between starts? Who knows, but it may be time to give a six-man rotation a try.
Or maybe forget about the concept of starter and reliever and pitcher wins as a statistic of importance. Maybe have a system with three or four three-to-five-inning guys, four or five two-inning guys, and three or four one-inning guys. And have a better system to quantify outs, so they can all get paid accordingly.
Now kids are going to college and getting routinely abused by their coach, who only cares about keeping his job and moving on to the next better one. So by the time they get to pro ball, they're already damaged goods. On the flip side, the ones who survive are so rare that they rake in the highest money come draft time.
It seems like a good time for the smart people in baseball to start thinking differently about the game. But the economics make it hard for both Capital and Labor to do that.