If the Cubs get screwed, then there will be an hour or two that day for which I will be in full support of instant replay. However, in tonight's game, I think the two angles only provided probable, as opposed to conclusive, evidence that the call was inaccurate, so I think that even if there were an NFL-like replay system, that McClellan's call would have stood. I also think that a replay on the Bartman play would not have resulted in a reversal, which would just piss me off even more. If the Cubs were in the Padres shoes tonight, I'd certainly be pissed, but there were 73 other games the Padres lost. I'm pissed about Bartman, but it was only strike two. Cubs had to lose entire games started by Z, Prior, and Wood. I'd be pissed the same way that losing those three games to the Marlins in September was that much more frustrating and catastrophic than losing the ones in May was. People tend to place more emphasis on one than the other due to timing in the season, but they're both three losses. Single plays in baseball simply don't carry enough weight in the grand scheme of a season or a post-season to warrant the cost and the pain in the rump that instant replay would bring. I don't see any way that Holliday's hand could have touched home plate. He slid with his hand outstretched, and when it hit Barrett's foot, his arm was forced down along his body. Unless his hand pushed Barrett's foot back - and it sure didn't look like this to me - the call would have been overturned. If there is a way to get a call right, I think it's ridiculous to push that aside for the sake of history or the human element. Just my opinion.