He only played in 151 games that year... clearly not a full year. are you kidding? are we arguing that cedeno hasn't really had a real shot in the majors because he had a few days off in 2006? if that's the case, then theriot really didn't get a shot last year, so we should give him a full season in 2008 to prove that he's good enough. reading comprehension is really suffering in this country. first of all, i didn't say that i am convinced that cedeno is a bust, i just don't think he will be a good player. second, there is a difference of about 450 PAs between pie and cedeno, not 300. third, look at the usage patterns: Pie @ age 22: -started the season in the minors -called up to the big club, starter for 2 weeks -mainly a bench player for 1.5 weeks -farmed out to iowa for a month -called up to the big club, regular playing time, mainly starting, for 3 weeks -mainly a bench player for 2 weeks -farmed out for another month -called up for final 2 months, little to no playing time Pie @ age 23: -regular playing time for 4 games -spot starts and pinch hitting after that Cedeno @ age 22: -mainly and defensive replacements spot starts during a handful of call-ups Cedeno @ age 23: -started 90 percent of the games at shortstop for 6 months so one guy has had 450 more PAs and a season in which he's started 90% of the games; the other guy's longest stretch of consistent playing time was 3 weeks last season. how on earth can anyone think these situations are pretty much equal?