or .406/.553/.735, 235 OPS+, 37 HR, 33 doubles, 120 RBI, 135 runs. ted williams lost out to joe dimaggio (joke) in 1941. joe's numbers: .357/.440/.643, 30 HR, 43 doubles, 11 triples, 125 RBI, 122 runs the next year ted went for: .356/.499/.648, 217 OPS+, 36 HR, 34 doubles, 137 RBI, 141 runs... and lost to joe gordon of (who else) the yankees, who had: .322/.409/.491, 155 OPS+, 18 HR, 29 doubles, 103 RBI, 88 runs then after winning the MVP in 1946 - basically his next season since he missed 1943-45 to the war, he got screwed over again in 1947: williams: .343/.499/.634, 205 OPS+, 32 HR, 9 triples, 40 doubles, 114 RBI, 125 runs dimaggio: .315/.391/.522, 154 OPS+, 20 HR, 10 triples, 31 doubles, 97 RBI, 97 runs my favorite, though, is 1949. ted won the MVP that year, getting 13 first place votes... but phil rizzuto had 5 first place votes and finished second. here's a comparison of their numbers: williams: .343/.490/.650, 192 OPS+, 43 HR, 3 triples, 39 doubles, 159 RBI, 150 runs rizzuto: .275/.352/.358, 88 OPS+, 5 HR, 7 triples, 22 runs, 65 RBI, 110 runs is there any better argument to invalidate the MVP award? five voters - more than 20% of the voting pool - thought that phil rizzuto was a more valuable player in 1949 than ted williams was! that's the dumbest thing ever.