except that hasn't been happening. at all. like not even close. http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2010/08/bonus-expenditures-2008-10/ biggest spenders in the draft from 2008-10 - the pirates. followed by a big market team (red sox), then the next seven teams on the list are nationals, orioles, royals, indians, rays, blue jays and rangers. meanwhile here are the bottom six teams: cubs, mets, marlins, phillies, braves, white sox. now i get that the teams toward the bottom tend to be drafting later, but still, the pirates, royals and rays are three notable small market teams that have been consistently going above slot money to draft hard-to-sign players. the mets, phillies, braves and white sox are kind of noted for rarely going above slot. same with international free agency - the a's outbid everyone for ynoa, the pirates outbid everyone for luis heredia, the twins bought miguel sano, the rangers have been spending gobs of money in latin america, etc. smart small to mid-market teams have seen what the rays did and are copying their blueprint. so really, the "best interests of baseball" argument would be a complete joke if selig ever tried to use it with respect to draft spending or international free agency. the system, as it is right now, works. teams that don't value amateur talent don't spend big bucks. teams that do value it do. and besides, it's not like selig is overturning these above-slot deals, he just lets the paperwork stew for a while, sends a nasty letter or e-mail to the offending team, then approves the signing. if he tried to overturn a deal like the one that samardzija got, MLB would be sued immediately. how exactly are his actions, as you put it, "not letting the teams with superior financial resources drive the bidding up for draftees"???