It's easy to say he should evolve into a ML average hitter overall, but the stats show that he was one of the worst hitters in all of baseball last year. He was actually worse than Izturis by a decent margin, and he certainly has been a worse hitter than Theriot. I'm fine with him playing every day for Iowa, where he can continue to work with Von Joshua and hopefully get back the confidence and discipline that he lost last year. You can shut up about Ryan Theriot. The Riot magic (luck) has worn off and he's simply not good. He's probably a better hitter than Cedeno at this point but doesn't play better defense. Worse than Izturis by a decent margin? He's FIVE runs worse over the course of a full season assuming he got ALL of the starts using Cesar's career .225 EqA and Cedeno's .215 EqA. If you use some PECOTA-adjustment (which you should) Cedeno is a present equal hitter. Those five runs over the course of a season are a WORST CASE scenario and are certainly worth betting for the payout of a player better than Izturis. Izturis is safer, but safe when you're crap like Izturis isn't exactly a good play. Give me the upside of Cedeno. To be honest Theriot and Cedeno are interchangeable in my opinion. So you're just assuming that Cedeno's 550 PAs last year were fluky bad? Actually his BABIP was .302, so it wasn't like he was unlucky. He was just a terrible ballplayer. Actually the guy I want playing SS is Fontenot, who won't play particularly good defense but will add more with the bat. His PECOTA numbers are more in line with his performance last year. I really don't see how it hurts to leave Cedeno at Iowa to gain confidence when the big club is obviously not going to be patient with him if he comes up and has 50 crappy ABs.