I think Joe Buck really does hate the Cubs, or at least dislike them... he's a Cardinal announcer, it's not too hard to see the connection. Meanwhile, where is the Jimmy-Claussen-is-God coverage the other day does one get the idea that ESPN hates ND? Oh brother, it's the media. They pump up Jimmy because he got hype. As soon as he shows signs of not being good (which he hasn't really yet), they'll rip him down like they do everyone they put up on a pedestal. And Pat Forde JUST WROTE an article blasting Weis for winning with Willingham's players and being unable to win with his own, ignoring A) that Ty couldn't win with his own players (ever notice how NO ONE points out that Ty's only decent season as coach came with Bob Davie's players?) and B) that very few of Weis's players had any experience at all coming into the season and were immediately charged with beating two (current) Top 20 teams, one on the road in front of 110,000. So there's that. ND got thoroughly outplayed in both games and hasn't scored an offensive touchdown yet this season. Not saying the blame all, or even much blame, belongs to Weis. But when Willingham went through those two bad years, the seniors and juniors on that team were all Bob Davie recruits. If your team has bad senior and junior players, you're not going to win, regardless of how promising your incoming freshmen and sophomores were. Look at the guys that Willingham inherited - not many guys who went on to be successful players at the next level. Willingham was also transitioning the program into a West Coast offense, and that takes time. He brought in a good recruiting class his first year - Quinn, Samardzija, Abiamiri, and a couple others - but then had a poor class his second offseason, coming off a bad 5-7 year. There was a lot of negativity surrounding the program at that point. I'd argue that the schedules that ND played under Willingham were more difficult than the ones they've played the last two years under Weis - mostly because the last two years a number of teams they've faced have been disappointing. I guess my point is, I don't think three years is enough to determine whether a guy is a good coach. Weis went out and won with Willingham's players - some of whom turned out to be really good - and now he's struggling with some weaker classes brought in by Willingham. It's very similar to what Ty did, but Weis seems to be the golden calf, whereas willingham was already being panned at this point. I don't know what the reason is. I would guess that more of it has to do with Weis' reputation as an offensive genius with a team that won three super bowl titles. But I can't say for sure that race didn't play a role as well.