Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    Trade Him or Promote Him. Either Way, Jefferson Rojas Will Play a Role in the Future of the Cubs

    It's been a terrific 2026 campaign for the Cubs' top prospect, Jefferson Rojas. But their current roster situation poses some tough questions about how he can best help them.

    Jason Ross
    Image courtesy of © Angelina Alcantar/ News Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

    Cubs Video

    Josiah Hartshorn has, for good reason, garnered many of the headlines around the Cubs farm system this year. He's the sexiest prospect of the moment for this team. He's the teenager already playing at High-A, and looking utterly dynamic. But he's still not the Cubs' top prospect. For now, that honor remains with Jefferson Rojas, who has had a very strong 2026 campaign in his own right.

    One reason we may be sleeping on Rojas is that the right-handed infielder wasn't good in his first action in Double-A last year. In his first 39 games in Tennessee (now Knoxville), the former IFA signing struggled to the tune of a 58 wRC+, swatting no home runs and posting just a .041 ISO. It's true that he was just 20 years old, and context should tell us that it's impressive any 20-year-old make it to Double-A, but it wasn't inspiring.

    Then, spring training happened. 

    Sporting a more athletic frame, the non-roster invitee blasted four bombs in the leadup to the regular season. Now, we should always take a spring training performance with a grain of salt, but mechanical changes and young players sporting transformed bodies are things to note, and so far, Rojas has proven that his spring was a sign of things to come.

    Another reason people may be sleeping on Rojas; he got off to a bit of a rough start in 2026, despite the great spring performance. Through May 24, the shortstop had just a 95 wRC+—certainly an improvement over his sub-60 wRC+ last year, but not the start that we all dreamed on after March, either. Rojas only had four round-trippers and certainly looked better, but was still leaving something to be desired. 

    A switch flipped on May 26 for the now-21 year old. He went 2-4 with a home run that day, and things seemed to fall into place. Over his last 24 games (107 PA), Rojas has absolutely turned it on. Hitting .383 while blasting seven bombs, Rojas has a sparkling 190 wRC+ over that span, enough to raise his season number to a 136 wRC+ on the year. With a strikeout rate of 18% and walking 9% of the time, he's kind of doing it all at the plate. Making consistent contact while hitting for power: it's impressive. 

    All of this, however, leads us to one important question: Exactly where does Rojas fit into the Cubs' long-term plan? Currently, the Cubs are running a pretty crowded infield crew. With Dansby Swanson only mid-way through a seven-year pact, the Cubs went out over the winter and added Alex Bregman to the infield for the next five seasons. Then, they extended second baseman Nico Hoerner for another six years. This doesn't even factor in former top draft pick Matt Shaw (who's been pressed into outfield duty due to the overcrowding) or breakout prospect Pedro Ramírez. Even for a 21-year-old who probably has another year of marinating to do in the minors, that's a logjam.

    One possible solution is that Rojas could move positions, which is probably in the cards anyway. While an alright shortstop today, there's a good chance that Rojas will either outgrow the position or never be good enough to play it longer-term at the MLB level. Baseball America describes his defense as follows: "In the field, Rojas is an average shortstop defender. His footwork and hands leave something to be desired and he’s prone to poorly timed dives on extra-effort plays." They go on to point out that he's got a plus arm and could stick at shortstop, but he's got work to do. 

    Instead, a plus arm and his athleticism would certainly allow you to dream of a potential third base, left field, or right field transition. The Cubs, likely blocked at second and third base for the balance of the decade, could see what Rojas's bat would do in the outfield. Prior to 2026, I'm not sure he'd ever showed the pop to feel confident about that transition, but a 136 wRC+ plays anywhere. Right now, rather than a guy who might hit 10 homers a year, he looks like someone who might hit 20 of them. The Cubs do have some outfield prospects in the system (the aforementioned Hartshorn, Kevin Alcántara, as well as 2025 first-round pick Ethan Conrad and second-round pick Kane Kepley, just to name a few), but the team is currently slated to lose both Ian Happ and Seiya Suzuki in free agency next year. It's a real pathway to cementing himself with the parent club some day.

    Beyond moving around chess pieces in order to find Rojas a home with the Cubs, Jed Hoyer has another option: trade his top prospect. While Shaw is looking pretty good in right field and Ramírez could conceivably handle left, the shortstop-to-corner-outfielder pipeline is not a common one, and it's probably not the best way to get a ton of slug into the lineup down the road. All three of them have a good amount of overlap in what they do—and because of that, there probably isn't a home for all three at the same time, either. It's unlikely that Rojas will be making any sort of impact in Chicago this year. If you're interested in a mid-year trade, Rojas is the best combination of being able to bring back a haul and not costing you much in the short term. 

    Obviously, Rojas is too good to be sent in a deadline deal for a rental. Twenty-one-year-old infielders who might stick at shortstop with a 136 wRC+ in Double-A don't grow on trees, What he would be able to do, however, is to play a starring role in a trade for a controllable starter (like, say, Reid Detmers?). It might be a tough pill to swallow, but the Cubs are going to have to make some tough decisions moving forward. Prospects are capital, first and foremost, and sometimes that capital needs to be spent via trade. Getting a controlled starting pitcher and continuing to build out the pitching depth (something the organization lacks) could be too good a chance to pass up. If you're unwilling to include Hartshorn in a big trade, perhaps the somewhat-blocked Rojas would be a more palatable loss.

    The good news is that the Cubs probably don't have to make a decision right now—or even in July—on the future of their big-time prospect. They can choose to go a different route via trade that doesn't involve Shaw, Ramírez or Rojas, or perhaps (if things fall off the rails) they'll stand pat. But a trade to thin this herd will have to happen at some point, either way. No matter what choice they make—either shipping out some of the overlap to give their infielder a free run to the majors or trading Rojas for a piece they feel they could use better—none of these are ultimately bad things. The only reason we're having these kinds of discussions are because he's been darn good. And regardless of what the Cubs end up doing, it seems quite obvious today that Rojas is about to play an important role in the future of the Cubs, one way or another. It will be either as a member of the North Siders, or as a primary trade chip.


    What would you prefer the Cubs do with Jefferson Rojas? Would you rather trade Matt Shaw or Pedro Ramirez? And what position do you think Rojas will eventually play? Let us know in the comment section below!

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos

    Cubs Top Prospects

    Mason McGwire

    South Bend Cubs - A+, RHP
    The 2022 8th-round pick was named to the Futures Game Roster. After missing the 2025 season, he is 3-3 with a 3.00 ERA in 15 games (9 starts) between Low and High-A. He has 64 strikeouts in 48 innings.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Bertz

    Posted

    One thing with Rojas is you can get away with not doing anything for a little while.  Keep him in AA until August, give him an MLB cup of coffee or three next year, and you don't reach the "crap or get off the pot" juncture until the '27/'28 offseason.

    I think, too, Rojas has a shot at having a bat you're happy with from a corner outfielder.  He's is on a 25/25 pace with better than average BB and K rates.  And he just turned 21.

    At the same time it's fair to wonder where he's going to play.  All three infield spots are locked down, and as a lefty Pedro Ramirez is a more natural compliment to the vets.  There's two corner outfielder spots unspoken for, but given timing I presume those are going to be filled this winter by Shaw and a $$$ signing.  You've also got Alcantara in the mix and Hartshorn and Conrad hopefully not way behind.

    It's probably the right time to trade Rojas.  If you think he's going to have a special bat or if simply the right deal doesn't come along it's totally fine to hang onto him.  But given what the team has in the cupboard I think you need to move Rojas or Shaw for pitching.  And given Shaw's here right now already producing, it's tougher to move him unless he's got way more trade value.

    • Like 2
    Victor Reichman

    Posted

    This is why the signing of Bregman hurt us badly. Not that he isn't a good player, even tho he has been pitiful with RiSP, I think he will improve. But to block 3B with him, harms development for Shaw, Ramirez and Rojas.  All are far more inexpensive with lots of upside. Especially. Shaw if he can play nearly everyday. His speed is 2nd only to PCA

    • Like 1
    Justspittintruths

    Posted

    And Hartshorn? Pretty sure most projections have him as a first baseman and isn’t he blocked by Busch? Maybe he can play outfield at the major league level, the same as Rojas, but Rojas has the added value of positional versatility that Hartshorn simply doesn’t. Or is positional versatility valuable in a Matt Shaw but not a Rojas? And while he may not be a significant base stealing threat at the major league level it indicates a plus base running and athletic mobility level that he has. And it seems weird, or perhaps telling, that his 25/25 pace while not being cancelled out with a high rate of caught stealing has to be brought up in the comments. Let’s also not gloss over that while Hartshorn is putting up great numbers at a high level at a young age, he is doing so in his own country which is undeniably more comfortable and one less hurdle than Rojas has to jump. Just pointing out there is an obvious underlying subtextual theme with all these “this guy must be the trade bait” articles and posts and their laughably biased reasoning.

    Justspittintruths

    Posted

    Also like to add, Jefferson Rojas doesn’t hang out with his good buddy Trevor Bauer in the off-season either. Maybe for some people being friends with Trevor Bauer is a positive…for some people. You do you, folks.

    mul21

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, Justspittintruths said:

    Also like to add, Jefferson Rojas doesn’t hang out with his good buddy Trevor Bauer in the off-season either. Maybe for some people being friends with Trevor Bauer is a positive…for some people. You do you, folks.

    Who is this in reference to?  

    Also, if you're suggesting some sort of racial bias from Jason here, you're waaaaaaaay off base.  He's been around here for a very long time and is a well respected contributor with a track record so I'd be cautious about throwing around accusations of that nature.

    • Love 1
    Tangled Up in Plaid

    Posted

    1 minute ago, mul21 said:

    Who is this in reference to?

    I know Ethan Conrad was in a Trevor Bauer video in the off-season, so maybe that's what they're referencing.

    • Like 1
    Bertz

    Posted

    We're all in agreement that's Tom, right?

    mul21

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Bertz said:

    We're all in agreement that's Tom, right?

    Not enough word salad for that I don't think.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Bertz said:

    We're all in agreement that's Tom, right?

    I've been waiting for someone to say that. I was thinking it. 

    Justspittintruths

    Posted

    Not Tom, but’s it’s hilarious that you want to claim that anyone that calls out horsefeathers is him. 

    Justspittintruths

    Posted

    And to you folks who seem to think you know everything, that IS your boy Josiah Hartshorn in the video of Conrad facing Bauer, sitting on the bench with Bauer’s OTHER buddies and giving commentary on the at-bats. That is the very definition of hanging out with Bauer. You are who you keep company with is an age old truism. This is my second attempt at posting this, since my other was removed because y’all can’t handle the truth. 

    JunkyardWalrus

    Posted

    Did I miss when he has to be added to the 40-man? 

    I can also see Dansby moving to a defensive/late inning type in a year or so, Hoerner or Rojas could be options at that point with the other, or Bregman, playing 2b etc. 

     

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    20 minutes ago, JunkyardWalrus said:

    Did I miss when he has to be added to the 40-man? 

    I can also see Dansby moving to a defensive/late inning type in a year or so, Hoerner or Rojas could be options at that point with the other, or Bregman, playing 2b etc. 

     

    I'm not really sure either are real SS options. Rojas really doesn't give off "long term SS vibes". Yes athletic but not "fast" or quick twitch. And he's growing muscular. He's probably much more of a corner infielder or a 2b. Just not sure he's getting up the middle or to the hole well enough. 

    As with Hoerner, ya know maybe you can squeeze a few years at SS from him. But I think it's important to note that his best plays take him closer to 1b not away from it, and in from 2b. He also has a pretty weak arm. I'm not sure he's going to slide over to SS so easily. 

    Even as such, you still have Shaw and Ramirez ahead of him, so any opening at 2b that Nico would open up would still be given to those two before Rojas presumably. 

    Not saying it's impossible, but there are some real obstacles to getting Rojas in the lineup on the infield. Think between the three he's got the best power upside to hang in LF but not sure it's good enough for me to say he has to be the guy of the there either. 



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...