Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • How Can the Cubs Shore Up Their Rotation Down the Stretch?


    Brandon Glick

    Justin Steele. The rebirth of Jameson Taillon. The high-functioning ghost of Kyle Hendricks. And… what else?

    Image courtesy of © David Banks-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    The Cubs’ rotation right now, heading down the stretch here in 2023 and in the heat of a playoff chase, is far from settled. Justin Steele has been a lockdown option atop the rotation, but he’s already gone past his previous career high in innings (119 innings pitched last year, 121 already this year). Jameson Taillon has seemingly rediscovered himself thanks to a reworked pitch mix. Still, his massive first-half struggles raise questions about his ability to keep up his recent performance (2.67 ERA in five starts in July, 3.00 ERA in two starts in August) through the end of the season. Kyle Hendricks has been a highly valuable innings eater, but he’s coming off a capsular tear in his throwing shoulder and was ineffective over the previous two seasons. Beyond that trio, already littered with their own asterisks, the Cubs have a lot of questions to answer in their rotation. 

    Marcus Stroman started this year on fire, earning a deserved all-star selection for his first-half performance (2.38 ERA in 102 innings through June). But ever since the blister issue in London against the St. Louis Cardinals, he’s struggled mightily (he has a 10.13 ERA in just 16 second-half innings!), and now he’s on the IL with a hip inflammation issue that the Cubs are praying is the source of his downtick in performance. Drew Smyly similarly started the year hot (3.15 ERA in 60 innings in April and May), coming off a scorching second half-last season (2.83 ERA in 57 and ⅓ innings). However, he’s been absolutely torched recently, giving up a preposterously high 7.22 ERA since May 28. He’s also been almost unbelievably susceptible to the long ball, giving up 1.76 home runs per nine (which, among pitchers who have thrown at least 100 innings this year, ranks ninth-worst in all of baseball). 

    The Cubs are responding in accordance with all of this information, moving Smyly to the bullpen and giving long-man Javier Assad another chance to lock down a spot in the rotation. Assad has been exceptional in long-relief, but he’s generally been a two-pitch pitcher that will need to expand his arsenal beyond the fastball/cutter combo (and occasional slider and changeup) to make it through the second and third time in an order. 

    Beyond him, the Cubs have some intriguing, though perhaps not-quite-ready, options available in-house to try and fill the void at the back end of the rotation that currently exists. 

    1. Ben Brown. Brown was all but certainly the next man up following his dominant start to the year at Double-A Tennessee (0.45 ERA in 20 innings pitched there). However, his recent strike-throwing troubles at Triple-A (40 walks in 65 innings) suggest he still has some refinement to work through before he’s ready. It’s also possible he’d be better utilized out of the big league bullpen this year, given his incredible fastball/curveball mix. And, of course, he was just placed on the Injured List, squashing any chance of him contributing in the immediate future. 

    2. Jordan Wicks. Armed with a 60-grade changeup and above-average command, Wicks is the most MLB-ready pitcher in the Cubs’ system at the moment. He hasn’t been dominant at Triple-A this year (4.24 ERA in 23 and ⅓ innings, with some meh peripherals to match), but his profile and diverse arsenal of pitches could make him a viable fifth starter down the stretch. 

    3. Riley Thompson. This is a name you’ve probably heard here and there as he’s steadily climbed the ladder over the years, though he’s having a tough go of it in his first taste of Triple-A this season (4.95 ERA in 60 innings, with an ugly 6.10 FIP). He was an exciting prospect following two really strong seasons in A ball to begin his career, but he lost two crucial years to the pandemic and still has yet to regain his footing. Hopefully, the Cubs can help him get there because the fastball/slider/curveball combo is genuinely exciting. Still, it would take a catastrophe of biblical proportions to see him on the big league team this year. 

    4. Kohl Franklin. Full disclosure, I love this kid. In my eyes, he has a top-three changeup in the system, and he started the season in such an electric way at High-A this year (2.79 ERA in 19 and ⅓ innings, with a sizzling 13.97 strikeouts per nine innings). He’s hit a speed bump at Double-A, mostly because of a spotty walk rate (4.58 walks per nine innings) which has always been his most glaring issue. He’s a true starting pitching prospect, but he’s only listed here because he’s Rule 5 eligible after the season and will need to be put on the 40-man roster anyways over the offseason to be protected (if the Cubs feel the need to protect him, of course). 

    5. Cade Horton. He won’t get called up, having just made it to Double-A, and he’s already thrown 65 and ⅓ innings this year after barely pitching in college. However, his arm is undeniably special, and he will (hopefully) be a staple of future Cubs rotations. He just won’t be able to help out this year, unfortunately.  

    On top of the guys listed, Hayden Wesneski and Caleb Kilian are already in the big league bullpen assisting as openers and in long-relief. With Smyly moving out of the rotation, chances are one of them could join Assad in the rotation, at least until Stroman returns. 

    The Cubs will need a strong effort out of whatever five they choose to start in the hunt for a playoff spot. However, it’s fair to lob a little criticism at the front office for not trying to plug this hole with a rental starter at the deadline (when the Stroman and Smyly issues were already apparent and actively hurting the team). 

    Who do you want to see the Cubs give a chance to this year? No pressure on answering that question. It’s only a spot in the playoffs on the line.

    Think you could write a story like this? North Side Baseball wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM NORTH SIDE BASEBALL
    — Latest Cubs coverage from our writers
    — Recent Cubs discussion in our forums
    — Follow NSBB via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a North Side Baseball Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Omgoodness we’re still funneling free credits to Kohl Franklin? Does any prospect in this org get more credibilities for doing less?

    His current AA line - as a true SP prospect no less - includes a 59:32 K/BB in 64 IP with 14 HRs 

    I’d love to see Richard Gallardo get healthy and make it a competition with Horton, who is probably the only potentially serious option here rn (I like Wicks overall but if I could add one skill or trait to the rotation it’s velo). Improving the bullpen would help the rotation too, Luke Little’s been throwing well in the upper minors this summer, Brown’s probably more suited for it anyway, Kilian’s got velo 

    Edited by TomtheBombadil
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    Omgoodness we’re still funneling free credits to Kohl Franklin? Does any prospect in this org get more credibilities for doing less?

    His current AA line - as a true SP prospect no less - includes a 59:32 K/BB in 64 IP with 14 HRs 

    I’d love to see Richard Gallardo get healthy and make it a competition with Horton, who is probably the only potentially serious option here rn (I like Wicks overall but if I could add one skill or trait to the rotation it’s velo). Improving the bullpen would help the rotation too, Luke Little’s been throwing well in the upper minors this summer, Brown’s probably more suited for it anyway, Kilian’s got velo 

    "...But he’s only listed here because he’s Rule 5 eligible after the season and will need to be put on the 40-man roster anyways over the offseason to be protected (if the Cubs feel the need to protect him, of course)."

    Franklin is far from a finished product, and I would never advocate for him to be in the majors this year, but he's a legitimate prospect. Obviously you want the results to be there for all prospects, but a lot of the time these guys in the minors are working on tweaks to their pitch shapes/deliveries/pitch mixes/etc. that get in the way of direct results. It's a developmental curve for a reason - it's not a linear path to becoming an MLB-caliber player. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Brandon Glick said:

    "...But he’s only listed here because he’s Rule 5 eligible after the season and will need to be put on the 40-man roster anyways over the offseason to be protected (if the Cubs feel the need to protect him, of course)."

    Franklin is far from a finished product, and I would never advocate for him to be in the majors this year, but he's a legitimate prospect. Obviously you want the results to be there for all prospects, but a lot of the time these guys in the minors are working on tweaks to their pitch shapes/deliveries/pitch mixes/etc. that get in the way of direct results. It's a developmental curve for a reason - it's not a linear path to becoming an MLB-caliber player. 

    I'm maybe less caught up in Franklin being mentioned as an option for this year (though he is the 4th specific name mentioned in an article asking how Cubs can help out the 2023 rotation) and more that he's like *still* considered a true and legitimate SP prospect no matter what he does. Everything you've said in this post applies to all players, but I rarely see this approach taken with a non-Franklin in the org. Heck, even moreso other players since Franklin's likely both older and had access to processes and resources longer

    The context I'm coming from is that I've been hearing about Franklin's big SP ceiling since he hit 100 in a Spring bullpen session to open 2021. He's popular with all the Cubs prospect guys online, likely in part because he's one of the most available players, and so his name's been bouncing around the echo chamber for 4-5 years now as like this Top Prospect with TOR Potential yada yada. Meanwhile he's about to turn 24 next month, last pitched like a low level SP prospect way back in 2019 in a friendly NWL, and is at a career high 83.1 IP as a true SP prospect who entered the org summer 2018 (he also missed his HS senior season to a hamstring issue). Seems as if in his case every struggle is just Development happening, every success a sign that he's turned the corner. Even with the mindset that pretty much any pro pitcher can turn it around for a little with some health and a tweak or add, he seems like a longshot to be an effective pitcher of any kind anytime soon

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Honestly a pretty turdly set of options.  Assad is the only one I have any hope for. Wesneski or Wick *might* be able to give you some replacement level starts.  Otherwise just do bullpen games.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    I'm maybe less caught up in Franklin being mentioned as an option for this year (though he is the 4th specific name mentioned in an article asking how Cubs can help out the 2023 rotation) and more that he's like *still* considered a true and legitimate SP prospect no matter what he does. Everything you've said in this post applies to all players, but I rarely see this approach taken with a non-Franklin in the org. Heck, even moreso other players since Franklin's likely both older and had access to processes and resources longer

    The context I'm coming from is that I've been hearing about Franklin's big SP ceiling since he hit 100 in a Spring bullpen session to open 2021. He's popular with all the Cubs prospect guys online, likely in part because he's one of the most available players, and so his name's been bouncing around the echo chamber for 4-5 years now as like this Top Prospect with TOR Potential yada yada. Meanwhile he's about to turn 24 next month, last pitched like a low level SP prospect way back in 2019 in a friendly NWL, and is at a career high 83.1 IP as a true SP prospect who entered the org summer 2018 (he also missed his HS senior season to a hamstring issue). Seems as if in his case every struggle is just Development happening, every success a sign that he's turned the corner. Even with the mindset that pretty much any pro pitcher can turn it around for a little with some health and a tweak or add, he seems like a longshot to be an effective pitcher of any kind anytime soon

     

     

    Oh I can certainly understand the prospect fatigue with him (and any prospect in general who takes a long time to figure their stuff out, if they ever do). 

    I can't speak for other Cubs' prospect people, though from what I can surmise the reason he's well liked is because the Cubs FO really loves him (and anyone with any sort of inside connection who hears that would obviously be inclined to feel similarly). 

    For me personally, I think Franklin has some of the best, call it "pitchability", in the system. He's a high IQ pitcher. He can work his way in and out of jams that most SP prospects don't have the composure for. It's his command that betrays him (which of course, is absolutely a huge red flag and something he needs to reign in over the next 16 months to remain on the radar). His changeup is so high floor that he can be a split-neutral guy from the get-go (which is extremely valuable for a pitcher who would theoretically go through an order two+ times every outing). 

    There's no doubt his curve has been bumpier than most. But that's the prospecting game. Most of these guys bust and drop off the radar forever. It's not about perfectly identifying a guy, it's about finding the ones who seem likeliest to overcome all the hurdles on the way to becoming a big league-caliber player. Franklin's experience with struggling at every level should help him as he makes his way to Triple A, but he definitely has to speed up his process and growing pains. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, Hairyducked Idiot said:

    Honestly a pretty turdly set of options.  Assad is the only one I have any hope for. Wesneski or Wick *might* be able to give you some replacement level starts.  Otherwise just do bullpen games.

    Yea, not great. REALLY wish the Cubs would've added a back-end guy at the deadline. Alas, they'll have to make due. 

    Unfortunately, the team will be HEAVILY relying on Stroman to come back completely healthy if it wants to make any noise. That's a lot to put on a 32 year-old groundball pitcher. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Brandon Glick said:

    For me personally, I think Franklin has some of the best, call it "pitchability", in the system. He's a high IQ pitcher. He can work his way in and out of jams that most SP prospects don't have the composure for. It's his command that betrays him (which of course, is absolutely a huge red flag and something he needs to reign in over the next 16 months to remain on the radar). His changeup is so high floor that he can be a split-neutral guy from the get-go (which is extremely valuable for a pitcher who would theoretically go through an order two+ times every outing). 

     

    There's no doubt his curve has been bumpier than most. But that's the prospecting game. Most of these guys bust and drop off the radar forever. It's not about perfectly identifying a guy, it's about finding the ones who seem likeliest to overcome all the hurdles on the way to becoming a big league-caliber player. Franklin's experience with struggling at every level should help him as he makes his way to Triple A, but he definitely has to speed up his process and growing pains. 

    Funny enough, I've been saying he's the total opposite here for 4 years now here. I see this guy as a very low aptitude pitcher. He's someone the Cubs don't really let get into and out of trouble, hence the low workloads, and even with that benefit still gets walloped.  He and the Cubs added some velo and shape to his pitches during and since the pandemic, he really had no breaking ball of any kind before and still it's just one often loopy curve, but unfortunately he has no idea what to do with that most of the time. TBH most of of why I even consider him a prospect at all is because a healthy pitcher's always got a shot to have some success in pro ball and being someone's nephew is a pretty surefire way to find opp. He's definitely had some early career bumps with the pandemic and the oblique knocking out 2021 right after, but that doesn't necessarily help the case as a serious ML SP prospect. The last time he performed like even a low level SP prospect was 2019 in a very, very friendly NWL. I have serious doubts the changeup could do so much damage because his fastball's meat for ML hitters

    I'm all about the bumpy road for prospecting, especially post-pandemic! There's just so many pitchers with a variety of ceilings in this org showing more aptitude in games than Franklin's shown especially since 2019. Heck, if it came down to either right now among currently healthy Smokies arms - thank goodness no - I'd say throw Porter Hodge out there or stick him on the 40 before Franklin

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...