Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    Cubs Sign Starting Pitcher Matthew Boyd to Two-Year Deal


    Matthew Trueblood

    In a deal reported deep in the night, the Cubs have set a high floor for the back end of their rotation, with a pitcher who provides depth and gives them many more options for their next moves.

    Image courtesy of © Scott Galvin-Imagn Images

    Cubs Video

    The Chicago Cubs agreed to a two-year deal with veteran left-handed starting pitcher Matthew Boyd, Jon Heyman reported early Monday night. The oft-injured southpaw will earn $29 million over two seasons, and the deal appears to be neither front- nor backloaded.

    All offseason, I have said the team needed to add two starting pitchers: one at the front end of their rotation, and one at the back. This is the latter type of move, but a very strong version thereof. Boyd, who will turn 34 on Groundhog Day, made only eight regular-season starts in 2024, and has not pitched even 100 innings in any season since 2019—although that year, he threw a whopping 185, in his second straight campaign as a high-volume starter with the Tigers.

    Durability is not Boyd's strong suit, but that might just be a good thing. He was available at this price precisely because he can't be counted upon for a whole lot of work, but when he's on the mound, lately, he tends to be quite good. He carried a 2.72 ERA and struck out 27.7% of opposing hitters for Cleveland during the regular season in 2024, and carried that brilliance right into October. He's a move more in keeping with the strategies we see embraced by the teams we all ask the Cubs to more closely mimic: the Dodgers, Yankees, Mets, and Padres, who compile depth in an acknowledgment of the risk of injury but don't simply pay for reliable innings at a low level of quality. They'd rather have a good pitcher than a merely average one, even if it means paying a premium for a player who might spend a good chunk of the season on the injured list.

    To those who don't follow the American League closely, Boyd probably isn't much of a recognizable name, but he's had a long and occasionally very promising career. The last few years have been painfully injury-disrupted. He missed most of the second half of 2021 with arm discomfort the Tigers couldn't help him diagnose or resolve, at a time when that organization did virtually nothing right. Finally, in September, he was diagnosed with a torn flexor tendon, and underwent surgery to repair it. He wouldn't pitch again until the final month of 2022, after signing with the Mariners over his injury-shadowed winter. Then, in June 2023, he tore his UCL, requiring Tommy John surgery and shelving him until the second half of 2024.

    Thereafter, though, he reminded everyone of the two reasons why he's consistently been in demand all these years:

    1. He can really pitch, as a lefty with a funky slot and a good arsenal—which got markedly better in 2024; and
    2. He's one of the game's good guys, beloved in every clubhouse to which he has ever belonged.

    Boyd was an integral part of the Guardians rotation down the stretch, and then allowed just one run in 11 2/3 innings of work over three appearances in the postseason. 

    Let's get into the nitty-gritty here, because it's pretty interesting stuff. Boyd, a Washington native who has long been a disciple of Driveline, is not a hard thrower, but he is a bat-misser, when he's right. He has a five-pitch mix: four-seamer, two-seamer, changeup, slider, curveball. The curve is sparingly used, and fairly new, but helpful. The four-seamer, slider, and change anchor the repertoire, and can mix in nasty ways.

    Screenshot 2024-12-02 033433.png

    As you'd expect, against lefty batters, Boyd is slider-heavy and prefers to pair it with the sinker—though, in a wrinkle we know the Cubs like, he uses that sinker more like a true two-seamer, with more arm-side run than heavy action, often attacking the upper half of the zone with it to jam a lefty or set up another offering. Against righties, he's primarily a four-seamer and changeup guy, and the curveball comes into play more.

    Screenshot 2024-12-02 034200.png

    For all our talk to date about how the Cubs like cut-ride fastballs, Boyd's is a pitch without a lot of vertical ride and with arm-side action, even from the four-seamer. It's probably best to think of him as a poor man's Sean Manaea for this offseason. Whereas Manaea would have cost the Cubs draft picks and is likely to get a three- or four-year deal worth more than $20 million per year, Boyd offers a much less durable (but similarly high-upside) low-slot, multi-pitch, veteran profile from the left side.

    For what it's worth, too, getting such a lefty might have been high on the team's priority list, if they believe at all in the strange phenomenon of Wrigley Field playing very lefty pitcher-friendly of late. I broke down the data on that earlier this offseason, and it's worth considering when evaluating the addition of Boyd, as opposed to (say) Frankie Montas, who signed a similar but larger deal with the Mets earlier Sunday night.

    Boyd will not sate the appetites of virtually any Cubs fan right away, but he's a solid addition. He's a clearly better pitcher than Jordan Wicks, and gives the team a better matrix of possible outcomes if Ben Brown, Hayden Wesneski, Cade Horton, or Brandon Birdsell are unable either to stay healthy enough to have an impact or to succeed as starters. He also makes it more feasible to trade from the team's upper-level pitching depth, should they end up in a negotiation wherein their young offensive prospects aren't quite getting the deal done in the right way.

    If this is the only major addition the Cubs make to their pitching staff this winter, it's insufficient. That feels unlikely, though. They paid a small early-winter, buy-now premium to land a player who can replace the gravitas of Kyle Hendricks and Patrick Wisdom, brightening the clubhouse a bit; has proved the ability to get out even very good hitters, very recently; and might have been undervalued by the market because of the way his injuries have prevented him from stringing together successful outings over the last four seasons. It reads as a move designed to give them upside even while adding to the back end of the rotation. They still have ways to further strengthen the team by adding to the front end, or by turning their attention to building an elite bullpen.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    • Like 1

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos

    Cubs Top Prospects

    Pedro Ramirez

    Iowa Cubs - AAA, IF
    On Thursday, the 22-year-old went 4-for-6with his fifth home run and five RBI. He also stole his 6th and 7th bases. In 16 games, he's hitting .328 (1.026 OPS).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Bertz

    Posted

    Glad your article about platoon splits at Wrigley is linked here because it popped into my head as I was reading about him and I wanted to revisit it.

    Like you have up top, if this is the lesser of two SPs being added this winter this is a fun little signing.  I expect pretty strong results on a per inning basis, but not a lot of innings.  I think with the cadre of young arms the Cubs have, that's the perfect tradeoff to have from a back-end arm.

    Another nice thing about Boyd is unlike Drew Smyly he actually has proper platoon splits, so if he does back up performance wise and shifts into that vacated long relief role it feels a lot easier to leverage him.

    Tim

    Posted

    This feels like a very interesting move.

    1. The Tigers of a few years ago were not at the top of anyone's list about maximizing pitcher utility
    2. Cleveland is at the top of those lists and he looked outstanding for them in 51IP (including playoffs)
    3. It's a significant contract, but $29/2 isn't going to break the bank if it doesn't work

    This is likely to end up being a meh kind of move, but he should help the team. And it does have the upside of being an Imanaga 2024 kind of an impact going forward.

    In my mind, I drew a comparison to drafting Horton based on his abbreviated draft season. If your scouts tell you that new level of performance is for real, then you have a potential stud at a price you couldn't otherwise get.

    Brock Beauchamp

    Posted

    Putting aside any grumbling about the Cubs' (and Hoyer's) refusal to buy into the top-end of the market, this is a good signing, IMO.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    I'll add here to what I did else where, on its surface, I'll remain confused by this, but mostly because I cannot see the bigger picture from where I'm sitting. It's not that I think this is bad, but the Cubs position now feels more and more like they have to nail the second SP. It's clear, as @Bertz said that the Cubs will add two pitchers. It's also clear that with the money they have left, that will almost assuredly have to be accomplished via trade. 

    If the Cubs can come away with a bang-on top-three pitcher that you can really be confident on, I think Boyd offers interesting value as an 80-100 IP guy who shares innings with guys like Birdsell, Horton, Wicks maybe Brown, Assad, etc in that #5 space, akin to how the Dodgers seemed to perpetually sign an Andrew Heaney or an Alex Wood type. 

    Where I fear is that the 2nd SP will be more along the lines of a "fix-em" or a "build-em" type which I think creates a bit more of an uneasy rotation heading into 2025 than I'd like to see. I'd like to see the Cubs chase current value as opposed to surplus value every waking moment, and with the limited chances the Cubs have to really upgrade this offseason, the remaining SP really represents one of the biggest and easiest ways to do that. It may work out in the end, but it might not. And seeing the Cubs put a confidently very good team on the field would be preferable. 

    Rex Buckingham

    Posted

    anyone think this means one (or more) of the young arms is headed out in a trade? If you are hoping for ~100 innings out of Boyd, maybe you replace innings you would have gotten from Birdsell, for example...

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, Rex Buckingham said:

    anyone think this means one (or more) of the young arms is headed out in a trade? If you are hoping for ~100 innings out of Boyd, maybe you replace innings you would have gotten from Birdsell, for example...

    I think that's a pretty fair bet. But I also think any trade that was going to net the Cubs an MLB cost-controlled SP, meant that the Cubs were likely trading a Wicks/Birdsell/Assad as is, too. Considering that the Cubs were probably going to always trade for a cost controlled SP, I don't think this changes the equation other than to say that I think it's even more likely that the Cubs make that kind of SP trade now.

    Bertz

    Posted

    52 minutes ago, Rex Buckingham said:

    anyone think this means one (or more) of the young arms is headed out in a trade? If you are hoping for ~100 innings out of Boyd, maybe you replace innings you would have gotten from Birdsell, for example...

    Definitely.  I think packaging one of the young Iowa bats and one of the pre-arb arms can get you most of the way to anyone realistically available in trade.  If you did something like Alcantara and Assad for Jesus Luzardo you've got some real risk in the rotation but hella talent and 4-5 legitimate SP options just a phone call away at Iowa.

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    Putting aside any grumbling about the Cubs' (and Hoyer's) refusal to buy into the top-end of the market, this is a good signing, IMO.

    Not sure how you can call giving 30M to a guy who is probably only going to see about 150 innings in his Cub tenure as a good signing. 

    Bertz

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

    Not sure how you can call giving 30M to a guy who is probably only going to see about 150 innings in his Cub tenure as a good signing. 

    So by no means is he Tom Glavine, but I do think we're probably overstating his fragility.  Through 2020 he was reasonably healthy.  Then in 2021 he had a flexor tendon surgery which bled into his 22 as well.  Then in 23 he had TJ surgery which bled into his 24.

    So yeah, 4 years in a row of low innings, but all tied to that balky elbow which is presumably fixed now.

    • Like 1
    Tryptamine

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    So by no means is he Tom Glavine, but I do think we're probably overstating his fragility.  Through 2020 he was reasonably healthy.  Then in 2021 he had a flexor tendon surgery which bled into his 22 as well.  Then in 23 he had TJ surgery which bled into his 24.

    So yeah, 4 years in a row of low innings, but all tied to that balky elbow which is presumably fixed now.

    The man hasn't pitched above 78.2 innings since 2019, I don't care the reasons, It's being absurdly optimistic to just think he's suddenly going to be a guy who is going to give you starter innings. If we get 100 innings out of him in either year, we should be thrilled. 

    Brock Beauchamp

    Posted

    6 hours ago, Tryptamine said:

    Not sure how you can call giving 30M to a guy who is probably only going to see about 150 innings in his Cub tenure as a good signing. 

    When it comes to starting pitching and given the Cubs' overall depth, I like an upside play and Boyd is a pretty decent upside play at those dollars.

    Of course, I also believe the Cubs should be playing in much deeper waters than they do, which is why I couched my statement with that.

    squally1313

    Posted

    7 hours ago, Tryptamine said:

    The man hasn't pitched above 78.2 innings since 2019, I don't care the reasons, It's being absurdly optimistic to just think he's suddenly going to be a guy who is going to give you starter innings. If we get 100 innings out of him in either year, we should be thrilled. 

    I mean, I get your points, but you should probably care about the reasons if you’re going to come to some final conclusion on the deal 12 hours into the contract. 

    • Haha 1


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...