Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Chicago Cubs Trade Target: Josh Naylor


    Matt Trueblood

    Unless and until the Cubs re-sign Cody Bellinger, they will have at least two distinct (but overlapping) needs on the position-player side of their roster: a left-handed slugger, and a first baseman. One potentially available player could fill both.

    Image courtesy of © Ken Blaze-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    There really shouldn't be any particular urgency for the Cleveland Guardians to jettison Josh Naylor. He's a livewire personality. His brother is their catcher of the present and future. He's even under team control for another two years. Alas, where the Guardians are concerned, "shouldn't" doesn't often go far enough. 

    According to MLB Trade Rumors, Naylor is in line to make roughly $7.2 million in 2024, via arbitration. That's a team-friendly price for a hitter of his caliber. Although a bit light on raw power, Naylor has emerged as a very good overall hitter since the start of 2022. He's hit .282/.336/.471 during that span, and was much better than that in 2023. With above-average contact skills and the ability to plug the gaps even when he doesn't clear the fence, Naylor is the kind of slashing presence that lengthens a lineup and cashes in rallies started by good tablesetters like Nico Hoerner and Ian Happ.

    Naylor won't turn 27 until next June. There's no reason to think he'll decline any time soon. In fact, on the contrary, there's still room for him to improve, given the talent he's already demonstrated. A team should jump at the chance to retain him for a salary that won't even crack eight digits, but the Guardians have never operated that way. This offseason, they're even more likely than usual to behave penuriously, because their cash flow has been (and will, in all likelihood, continue to be) disrupted by the fallout of the Diamond Sports Group bankruptcy. 

    Between a genuine pinch on revenue, the retirement of Terry Francona, and the fact that the Twins asserted what could be a long-term primacy in the AL Central, this winter looms as something more like a rebuild than a lean-in on the shores of Lake Erie. That could shake Naylor loose. If all that wouldn't do it, though, the trade the Guardians made with the Rays this summer might. In exchange for right-handed starter Aaron Civale, Cleveland acquired first baseman Kyle Manzardo, a prospect on the cusp of MLB readiness. He's five years younger, but in all other respects, he's close to being a carbon copy of Naylor. 

    The Cubs have what it would take to acquire Naylor. It might be an uncomfortable deal, in which they give up either high-upside prospects some distance from the big leagues or some of their prized pitching depth at the highest level--guys like Javier Assad, Hayden Wesneski, or Ben Brown. Those are the hurlers who can help Cleveland recover some of what they've lost over the last year or two--thanks to the ravages of both injury and ineffectiveness. None of those guys are stars, but they all have considerably more team control left--at a lower cost--than Naylor has. This is a good moment to remember, too, that Cubs GM Carter Hawkins is a former Cleveland employee. These teams have some common DNA. Surely, Cleveland would think they could do something interesting with each of those guys, and that they could continue the good things the Cubs have already done with them.

    Alternatively, of course, there's the possibility of a deal involving a young outfielder. The Cubs wouldn't give up Kevin Alcantara for anything less than a star, and Naylor (for all his gifts) is not that. Alexander Canario could be a fine piece in this kind of deal, though. The Guardians are always short on power in the outfield. One way or another, a fit is there for these two teams, if they want it.

    The obvious alternative to all of this is the first one I mentioned: the Cubs could re-sign Cody Bellinger. Certainly, after the year he just had, that would be just about everyone's first choice. There's a lot to consider, though. Bellinger was a joy to watch in 2023, but there are all sorts of reasons to think him unlikely to repeat that performance in 2024--or, perhaps, ever again. He hits the ball much less hard than does Naylor (although hr does get it in the air with authority a hair more often). They walk at roughly even rates, and Naylor struck out even less than Bellinger did last year. Sure, Bellinger has greater defensive value, but that's more than canceled out by the fact that he'll sign for something like four times Naylor's 2024 salary, with guarantees of making that much into his mid-30s. 

    If watching another long MLB postseason unfold without the Cubs has yielded any irrefutable lessons, one is this: the Cubs need more than one more good hitter. They're far short of being a World Series contender. Naylor can't fix all that ails them, but he could be a very, very good complementary piece, at a bargain price.

    Think you could write a story like this? North Side Baseball wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM NORTH SIDE BASEBALL
    — Latest Cubs coverage from our writers
    — Recent Cubs discussion in our forums
    — Follow NSBB via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a North Side Baseball Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    If Naylor is an option I would hope the Cubs also add a pitcher from the guardians. One stop shopping. I would have wanted McKenzie, but I am not sure he is healthy. But they have other options. If they did go with Naylor then Mervis might as well be in the deal. Depending on if they got a pitcher too and what pitcher that was, obviously more would need to be added. But to me, they are a good team to get a pitcher from. Hawkins should know the young arms there. Bieber is also an obvious trade candidate, but his velo is down a little. So not sure I want to pay what is needed for him. 
     

    I really think trades will be the way of acquiring more talent this year than FA signings. And I feel the Guardians are a good trade option. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    If Naylor is an option I would hope the Cubs also add a pitcher from the guardians. One stop shopping. I would have wanted McKenzie, but I am not sure he is healthy. But they have other options. If they did go with Naylor then Mervis might as well be in the deal. Depending on if they got a pitcher too and what pitcher that was, obviously more would need to be added. But to me, they are a good team to get a pitcher from. Hawkins should know the young arms there. Bieber is also an obvious trade candidate, but his velo is down a little. So not sure I want to pay what is needed for him. 

    I really think trades will be the way of acquiring more talent this year than FA signings. And I feel the Guardians are a good trade option. 

    How much was Bieber's velo down? I guess once the Guardians dropped out of contention, I stopped paying attention to what was happening over there. I know he only made a few starts at the end of the season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good stuff, I really like Naylor as a trade target, his name has caught my eye a few times in scanning for potential bats.  On top of what you mentioned he also has only played for one org, which I always think of as a small bonus in an acquisition because it makes it a small bit more likely different/varied instruction may unlock something new in him.  The problem I've run into with any Guardians trade targets is that I'm not sure what they are/what they want to be, so while I don't doubt the Cubs could be the winner for Naylor's services if he's made available, I struggle to come to a 'this is a realistic package that meets their needs' point because they have a deep system and are never at the extreme ends of the competitive spectrum.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like Naylor as a player, but I wonder if he's a bit too much of a tweener for what we're looking for this offseason. 

    He'd be a pretty weak primary bat to acquire.  His 2.5 WAR and 128 wRC+ marks last year were a career high, and a large part of that is he finally started hitting lefties.  But platoon splits are famously fickle, you can't count on him holding onto all of those gains (just look at Ian Happ).  

    And like you said, the trade cost won't be especially small, which IMO hurts his shine as a secondary acquisition.  His salary kind of works against us here.  He's probably not a very different player in terms of impact than e.g. Jorge Polanco, but the latter's salary will hold down the prospect cost.  In terms of magnitude it's probably the difference between an Assad/Wicks/Brown and a Wesneski/Kilian.  That's not necessarily a deal breaker, but would feel like a lot after making a deal for a Soto or a Glasnow or one of the Mariners starters.

    I'd probably rather have Mitch Garver or Brandon Belt in FA, or address another position (e.g. Polanco at 3B) which would allow you to feel more comfortable trying to just cobble it together at 1B.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    I like Naylor as a player, but I wonder if he's a bit too much of a tweener for what we're looking for this offseason. 

    He'd be a pretty weak primary bat to acquire.  His 2.5 WAR and 128 wRC+ marks last year were a career high, and a large part of that is he finally started hitting lefties.  But platoon splits are famously fickle, you can't count on him holding onto all of those gains (just look at Ian Happ).  

    And like you said, the trade cost won't be especially small, which IMO hurts his shine as a secondary acquisition.  His salary kind of works against us here.  He's probably not a very different player in terms of impact than e.g. Jorge Polanco, but the latter's salary will hold down the prospect cost.  In terms of magnitude it's probably the difference between an Assad/Wicks/Brown and a Wesneski/Kilian.  That's not necessarily a deal breaker, but would feel like a lot after making a deal for a Soto or a Glasnow or one of the Mariners starters.

    I'd probably rather have Mitch Garver or Brandon Belt in FA, or address another position (e.g. Polanco at 3B) which would allow you to feel more comfortable trying to just cobble it together at 1B.

    Touch to say with Naylor. Was last year a career year or at 26 is he finally becoming the player he will be for a number of years? It it is the latter. I wouldn’t mind him for several years at 1st. I do like Garver also. Why not both? One at 1st and the other DH. Sign Bellinger and deal PCA for Naylor and Bierber or the best young controlled pitcher Cleveland has. As for PCA to the Guardians, I am not an expert on trades. So I don’t know what is needed to be added either way if the Cubs ended up with Naylor and Bieber(or one of the other young controlled pitchers the Guardians have). 
     

    A 24’ line up with Bellinger, Naylor, Garver and Morel(at third) added to the core they have already would be a very solid line up. Beiber or one of the young controlled pitchers added to the rotation would make for a solid rotation. 

    And I would think that could be done within the LT threshold. Or at least only breaking the first level if they also added some pen help. 
     

    of course, all if the above said, if they really could get Soto AND extend him, that would be first option for me. I just don’t expect that. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

    Grab Karinchak while his stock is low 

    I’m most on this wagon with the Guardians. Maybe the prettiest curve in the league, arb eligible off a down year

    Naylor’s an interesting player but I don’t expect Cleveland to make him available? He’s cheap power they don’t have around and won’t replace easily 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    I’m most on this wagon with the Guardians. Maybe the prettiest curve in the league, arb eligible off a down year

    Naylor’s an interesting player but I don’t expect Cleveland to make him available? He’s cheap power they don’t have around and won’t replace easily 

    You are probably right, but it is the Guardians however. And they have Manzardo waiting to bring up and play 1st. So if they can replace him with cheaper and also get good cheap talent back in the way of a prospect they might make a deal. They are always looking to cut costs. Every little bit helps. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Rcal10 said:

    You are probably right, but it is the Guardians however. And they have Manzardo waiting to bring up and play 1st. So if they can replace him with cheaper and also get good cheap talent back in the way of a prospect they might make a deal. They are always looking to cut costs. Every little bit helps. 

    I suspect Cleveland’s plan A is finding a starting SS who can pick it to go with Gimenez in the MIF 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    I suspect Cleveland’s plan A is finding a starting SS who can pick it to go with Gimenez in the MIF 

    How valuable would Luis Vazquez be to them? I know he hasn't sniffed the majors and this year was a career year with the bat, but he's got a pretty great reputation defensively

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    58 minutes ago, Rex Buckingham said:

    How valuable would Luis Vazquez be to them? I know he hasn't sniffed the majors and this year was a career year with the bat, but he's got a pretty great reputation defensively

    Probably way less than Rocchio let alone Kim or Wily Adames 

    Random but Aaron Bracho is rule 5 eligible this year in that org, is a pretty good fit with Cubs as a LHH IF 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...