Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    5 Questions That Will Determine the Direction of the 2026 Chicago Cubs

    It's Opening Day, and the 2026 Chicago Cubs look solidly better than any iteration of the team since at least 2018. Whether they can win as many games as that team (or get even deeper into the postseason), however, will hinge on these five key questions.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

    Cubs Video

    Opening Day is the philosopher's holiday, for it's much more about questions than answers. We won't instantly have complete insight into the 2026 Chicago Cubs after Thursday's season opener; we'll merely have a lone game of data to which to cling as we scramble to reinforce our prior beliefs. Even a week or a month from now, answers about who and what this team is will be elusive; that's the nature of a 162-game marathon. Thus, Opening Day is primarily about agreeing on which questions matter most. Here are five things Cubs fans should watch and wonder about, beginning Thursday and stretching slowly across the spring and summer.

    1. Will the Cubs Get Edward Cabrera Right?
    At the risk of triggering many Cubs fans who lived through the unhappy denouement of the last miniature Cubs dynasty, the player who looms as a warning against full-fledged enthusiasm about Cabrera is former high-profile, electric-armed acquisition Tyler Chatwood. The Cubs front office was very excited to get ahold of Chatwood, but his awful command compromised his awesome raw stuff. Cabrera should be better than Chatwood was, but tapping into the best version of him means getting some key developmental dilemmas just right.

    The good version of Cabrera is neck-and-neck with Cade Horton for the title of ace in this rotation, and could strike out 250 batters. The bad version runs into so many problems with his suboptimal fastball shape and average-minus command that his ERA balloons toward 5.00, even if he stays healthy. The Cubs spent the spring trying to help him find the version of his fastball that can set up the rest of his arsenal, but we won't know how successful that experiment was for some time.

    2. Which Version of Pete Crow-Armstrong's Offensive Profile is the Real Deal?
    He's officially the face of the franchise, now. He's one of the best defenders in baseball. He's only 24 years old. Crow-Armstrong is the Cub with transformational, superstar potential—but ultimately, he had a .287 OBP last year. His lack of plate discipline became a real and serious problem; we don't yet know whether he can be a consistently effective hitter.

    All the power-speed dynamism he's demonstrated makes Crow-Armstrong the centerpiece of this lineup, if he's the best version of himself. That version of him has to be one with a more consistent plan in the batter's box, though.

    3. Does Dansby Swanson Have Time Left at Shortstop?
    The Cubs have to be pleased to have gotten three years into a seven-year pact with Swanson without having to even consider moving him off the position they signed him to play. He's been a consistently above-average shortstop and the anchor of a team defense that lies at the heart of their overall team-building philosophy.

    But that can't last forever. Regular shortstops who stay at that position into their mid-30s are virtually unheard-of in the modern game, and Swanson is now 32. He'll still play there this season, but whether he can remain a plus glove is a very fair question—and a very important one, to this year's team.

    4. Can Matt Shaw Handle His New Role?
    It was a highly productive spring for Shaw, who learned to play the outfield and showed off a blessedly simplified setup in the batter's box. The Cubs need that to translate to the games that count, but the challenge ahead of Shaw is even greater than the one behind him. He'll be finding his playing time one game at a time this season, but he's an important part of the team's plans. Without sturdy contributions from him on both sides of the runs ledger, the lineup's depth won't match that of the Brewers. If Shaw takes a big step forward, though, he could be a catalyst for the ascendancy of the whole club. 

    Here's the problem: For any player, succeeding while moving between positions and sitting at least one or two days a week is difficult. For a young guy who's shown shaky pitch recognition and whose mechanics are always in danger of unproductive digression, it's doubly so. Shaw has to prove himself unusually good at a tricky balancing act.

    5. Will the Bullpen Be as Good as Its Less Proven Previous Editions?
    By Jed Hoyer standards, the Cubs made big investments in the bullpen this winter. It was an overhaul of the relief corps, and one that leaves them with few optionable arms. On the other hand, they have lots of proven dudes out there, in Phil Maton, Hunter Harvey, Caleb Thielbar, Hoby Milner, and Jacob Webb. It's a group the team should be able to count on not to implode, as some recent acquisitions have (Héctor Neris, Ryan Pressly), but the upside is a bit limited. Even acknowledging the emergence of Daniel Palencia as a true relief ace, the team needs someone to take an unexpected step forward in order to get a championship-caliber performance from this pen.

    That makes Ben Brown a pivotal arm. Relegated to the pen by a healthy and deep starting rotation, Brown has a chance to be that wipeout multi-inning reliever that has so often been the signature of Craig Counsell's bullpen management. But Brown still carries real risk, and the team still needs someone from the rest of the mix (perhaps Harvey, whose stuff stands out from the crowd) to have something better than their average outcome this year.


    This team has 100-win upside, and should be over .500 even in a relatively unlucky world. They're a legitimate threat to the hegemony of the Brewers in the NL Central. They still face some big questions on Opening Day, but the answers to those questions look likely to be positive.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    • Love 1

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos

    Cubs Top Prospects

    Pedro Ramirez

    Iowa Cubs - AAA, IF
    On Thursday, the 22-year-old went 4-for-6with his fifth home run and five RBI. He also stole his 6th and 7th bases. In 16 games, he's hitting .328 (1.026 OPS).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Clark_Addison

    Posted

    Now this is a great article with good points.  Dansby has a year or two left at SS until he needs to move to 2B, which is a great questions when you consider we all want Hoerner to be extended. Where will both play if that happens as Nico will be 31 in 2 years so would seem strange to swap them then. Could the Cubs switch them next season? Will Nico jump at the best opportunity to play SS, which would likely pay him more if a team views him that way. 

    Tyler Chatwood....such a disappointment.  I never watched video of him before seeing him pitch in a Cubs uniform and the first pitch I saw I was like what is he doing. So obvious that he had basic flaws that HAD to be corrected in his mechanics. Cabrera on the other hand passed the eye test very well. I have wanted Cabrera on the Cubs for awhile and can't wait to see how he does with an elite defense behind him and an infrastructure behind him like the Cubs (vs the Marlins). 

    I believe PCA has a chance to be an elite bat, but he has to learn the strike zone better and learn to swing at pitches he can do damage with and not pitchers pitches that he can get to (and yet not just get to but crush some of those). I really didn't get why any pitcher was throwing him strikes after a few months last year. If he learns patience and how to work counts he is going to get better pitches to hit as a walk can turn into a double or triple so fast with his speed. 

    Shaw is a ballplayer and I expect he will be good moving around but will fans give him any leeway when he does make a bad play which is going to happen, especially at positions he has very little time playing. 

    Did I miss #5? Don't see it. Maybe it didn't load right. 

    Nolansomebody

    Posted

    I don’t mean to be a stickler, but there’s only 4 questions in this article.

    That being said, I wouldn’t be surprised if Shaw takes a slight dip in performance due to the pressure for him to succeed.

    Clark_Addison

    Posted (edited)

    Crazy it didn't load right, refreshed and there it is #5!  I like the mix of arms in the bullpen and Brown could be great as a reliever, especially with a 3rd pitch finally.

    Opening Day is here!!

    Edited by Clark_Addison
    • Like 1
    mul21

    Posted

    Asking if the guy who finished 7th in MLB in DRS among SS is still capable of playing there is certainly not a question I'd spend much time pondering, but I suppose we need to create content somehow.

    Development DL

    Posted

    Thoughtful piece for opening day . You are always pointing to the why and what if . 
     

    This definitely enhances my fan experience. 

    Bertz

    Posted

    I think to me the two biggest questions are:

    1. How well does the team walk the line between holding onto depth and not wasting bullets?

    For example if Jameson Taillon has an ERA north of 6 and peripherals to match, how many starts does he get before he's yanked from the rotation?  3? 5? 10?  On the flipside even if no one is struggling let's say Ben Brown is monstrous in long relief or Jaxon Wiggins is demolishing AAA, how long does it take to get them into the rotation?

    2. The team has seven full time players heading into FA next winter (4 bats, 3 SPs).  How many of those spots can you feel confident in filling internally by the time October runs around?

    For instance Kevin Alcantara is the ideal internal choice to replace one of Happ/Suzuki next year.  But is he going to get enough 2026 plate appearances that we can confidently say whether he should or should not get a 2027 job?  If he only gets ~200 PAs this year, even if they're great how much can you take away from that?

    These are thankfully not the worst problems to have.  It's not quite champagne problems but it's a far cry from "do we have a single viable 3B anywhere in this damn org?" like we were asking a few years ago.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...