Rank the NL for 2008

[17 Seconds]

You think the Astros are contenders but the Padres aren't? That's, um, interesting.

 

It's called a prediction.

 

 

Id like to hear you basis for this prediction, cause the Astros rotation is horrible outside of Oswalt.

 

and decent starters behind him (Backe, Wandy, Williams and Sampson).

 

Decent? That's like having 4 Jason Marquis' after Zambrano.

[moochpuppy]

1. Mets

2. Dodgers

3. Diamondbacks

4. Phillies

5. Cubs

6. Brewers

7. Rockies

8. Braves

9. Astros

 

------------------contender line-------------------

 

10. Cardinals

11. Reds

12. Padres

13. Pirates

14. Nationals

15. Marlins

16. Giants

 

1.Cubs (+4)

2.Phillies (+2)

3.Brewers (+3)

4.Mets (-3)

5.Astros (+4)

6.Cardinals (+4)

7.Marlins (+8)

8.Dodgers (-6)

9.Diamondbacks (-6)

 

------------------contender line-------------------

 

10.Reds (+1)

10.Rockies (-3)

12.Braves (-4)

12.Giants (+4)

14.Pirates (-1)

15.Padres (-3)

16.Nationals (-2)

 

Way off on the Marlins, Dodgers (still contenders) and Diamondbacks (still contenders). Was correct about the Astros being better than people thought and the Padres being worse than people thought. :thumbsup:

[Vanilla Ice]

1/2 Mets/Cubs (Mets if they get Santana, Cubs if they don't)

3 Dodgers

4 Phillies

5 Brewers

6 Rockies

7 Padres

8 Diamondbacks

-------------------------

9 Braves

10 Reds

11 Cardinals

12 Marlins

13 Astros

14 Nationals

15 Giants

16 Pirates

not too bad for me at least up until the Rockies