Think about it. Over the 2004 and 2005 seasons, the Cubs had invested close to $18M in Remlinger, Hawkins and Borowski. That amount would have paid for Jeff Kent. I know - it's not an apples to apples comparison. Whether it is or is not, it's just further proof that paying obscene amounts for bullpen arms is a waste of money. The correlation between salary and success is lower in the bullpen than anywhere else on the field. As the Angels have proven the last 5 years, great bullpens can be made for very, very cheap. Yet, the Cubs continue to pay millions to guys based on 60 good innings the previous season. Yet, the difference between a 3.00 ERA and a 4.00 ERA over that many innings is 7 runs, within the whim of pure luck, and certainly not enough to conclude that the guy with the 3.00 ERA is the better pitcher. Yet, teams are falling all overthemselves to acquire the guy with the lower ERA. (See, e.g. Kolb, Danny.) Position players are much safer bets because the sample size is so much larger. Yet, our "genius" GM keeps throwing money at the bullpen. It's simply a waste of money.