Honestly, that's a very par result given the quality of the U.S. team and who we faced. It's not good or bad, it's just who we are. Based on who we should have beat, should have lost to and could have gone either way, we should have gone 2-1-1 with wins over Slovenia and Algeria, loss to England and draw with Ghana....but since we played Ghana in the knockout round, we should have beaten them so 3-1-0 The U.S. isn't good enough to say we "should" get three wins in four games against WC-quality international teams. Yes, individually, a win had the plurality of the odds in each of those three games. But that's like saying the best team in every sport "should" go undefeated, because they "should" win every game. Two wins out of the four is par, and since we really did beat Slovenia, I'd say we were who we are. It's exciting to see the U.S. show that they can score goals consistently at this level. Past U.S. teams were the Nashville Predators, this team looked more like the playoff Flyers.