Vance, your education is not yet complete. Today's lesson-Lyman Bostock. Bostock was an OF with the California Angels in the 1970's. He signed a long term contract. Bostock's 1978 season started off a disaster, with him batting only .150 for the month of April. Bostock went to Angels' owner Gene Autry and attempted to give back his April salary, saying he hadn't earned it. Autry refused, so Bostock announced he would be donating his April salary to charity. Thousands of requests came in for the money, and Bostock went through each of them, trying to determine who needed it the most. Tsk..tsk. Continue to answer my questions then. Do you think Gagne bilked the Dodgers? Did Driefort bill the Dodgers? Did Mo Vaughn bilk the Angels? Or furthermore, did Kaz Matsui bilk the Mets? Did Chan Ho Park bilk the Rangers? Is Adrian Beltre bilking the Mariners right now? The fact is, Wood along with all these players, signed negotiated contracts. There was no swindling involved. The teams could have said no to length and dollars. Might someone else have paid up? Likely. That's the game one plays with these big money deals. When you use a term like "bilk" along with the other vitriol you spew toward Wood, it implies something dishonest on Wood's part. It implies that he knew he couldn't live up to the contract and signed it anyway. Wood had the following numbers in 2002-2003: 2002: 213.7 IP, 110 ERA+ 2003: 211 IP, 133 ERA+ He was 26 during the 2003 season. After that season he signed the 4/32.5 contract. Including the buyout of the option it was guranteed 4/37.5 contract for an average of 9 million a season. Ben Sheets pitched220.7 innings in 2003 and posted a 98 ERA+ and then 237 innings in 2004 and posted a 154 ERA+. He was also 26 in the 2004 season. He followed those two years by signing a 4/38.5 million contract, essientially one million less than Wood. While Sheets 2004 was better than Wood's 2003, the combination of their work is eerily similar. Next, let's look at AJ Burnett. Burnett only pitched 120 innings in 2004 while posting a 112 ERA+. His 2004 was remarkably similar to Wood's 2002, except for the fact Wood was healthy and Burnett was not. Burnett then pitched 209 innings in 2005 and posted a 117 ERA+. Wood's 2003 was better. Burnett was already 28 in 2005. Burnett was able to turn those two years into a 5/55 contract. Much greater than anything Sheets or Wood received, partially because he could negotiate on the open market. But it goes to show what both the Brewers and Cubs knew could happen if they let their big fish out to play on the open market. I could go on, but I think I have aptly proven that your use of the word bilk is in error. It's obvious you have other issues with Wood other than the contract he signed. While the Cubs never did get a return on their investment, the contract signed in good faith by two parties seems right in line with what other players with similar performance coming off two healthy seasons would have signed. In some ways, it seems Wood may have given a bit, yet only a small bit, of a hometown discount.