The thing is, an essay map needs to be incorporated into the paper somehow, and most essay maps really require three major points. The A's were the obvious choice and Boston because of the Bill James hiring and how they went on to win the World Series, but then there's no other obvious team that's been successful. The Braves seemed logical because they understand the value of their farm system, EqA, etc. I'll probably do Indians now that it's been mentioned, that one slipped my mind but it's a good example. By the way, I don't think I can be considered lazy for this paper...I'm been working on it for quite some time and I've posted a couple of topics on these forums already asking for advice. Also, is it lying? The Braves have been successful and I'm sure sabermetrics have been a part of it. The Braves success is probably more due to excellent scouting rather than a focus on sabermetrics. If you recall in Moneyball, Beane reduces his risk by drafting college players. That is one of his primary facets of success. The Braves do just the opposite. They target high schoolers that they believe their player development people can mold into all-star caliber baseball players. I'm not saying the Braves don't rely on statistics as they have an incredible front office, but they are many teams that are more sabermetric than the Braves in their approach. In fact the amount of money placed into the Braves scouting and player development is contrary to the sabermetricians view of the draft. I'm pretty sure the Braves would draft players based on the scouting tools rather than the stats put up in college. The Braves would have never drafted Jeromy Brown. Including the Braves as an example is not showing intellectual integrity. I understand the essay map, and you might get away with it because your teacher may not have an intricate knowledge of baseball, but if a student handed in that paper to me with the Braves as an example and with the knowledge I have on the subject, I would deduct a large number of points.