I don't follow this line of thinking at all. How do you acknowledge that some players are negatively affected by high pressure situations, yet at the same time say that those that are affected in a positive way are just random occurrences. Seriously, this makes zero sense. If that were the case, wouldn't they be good all the time? It makes complete sense. Once again, how do you explain some closers being more effective in save situations than non-save situations? Small sample of closers in non-save situations, it could be outliers or it could be something more. We can't really tell. Sure, it could be the brightness of the sun, or the fullness of the moon, or the prayer that the closer says before he comes into the game. I think the problem I have with this whole argument is that the people that are arguing that there is no such thing as clutch, are completely failing to back up their argument. Instead of backing up the argument that there are no clutch hitters we are left with such silly arguments as "they should probably switch it on and duct tape it to the wall". Unfortunately, the human body doesn't work that way.