Perhaps you are right, but I personally don't see how it matters because the only advantage Helton's team could gain from his testimony would be that Bradley is suspended...which doesn't matter because Bradley is out for the season already with his injury. The question isn't how the Padres respond to it. It's how the umpires respond. He sides with the umps, and maybe they get some preferential treatment. He sides against them, and they may attempt to find retribution. I hadn't thought about that angle, good point. I hadn't thought about that either, and I agree. I was just thinking from the standpoint of avoiding any possibility of Helton being made into the bad guy on this thing while emotions are no doubt running very very high, and the Rockies are still a stakeholder in the playoff race. This is all exactly why I think that MLB should do the entire investigation as quietly as possible, to the point where we never find out what Helton has to say. Of course, if the ump gets suspended or severely reprimanded in any way, it'll be apparent what Helton must have said, but I don't want the official version of the investigation to even mention that they contact Helton. Keep politics out of it as much as possible.