you're kidding, right? there are 162 games in a ML season, correct? if you watch the team play everyday and assume that you can learn everything you need to know, you're naive. if you watched the marlins play 162 games in 2004 and watched them play 162 games in 2005, without having any access to statistics, you wouldn't know the difference between pierre 04 and pierre 05. the difference between a .275 hitter and a .300 hitter is like 1 hit a week, how in the bloody heck can you see that by ignoring stats? trusting only in outdated conventional wisdom is foolish. the world is not flat, nor is the earth the center of the universe, and put your torch and pitchfork down. Your point is well taken, but I think the bolded portion is a bit much. maybe, but i think it fits. the paradigm is shifting, and many who value the old one don't like it one bit. the fact that statistical analysis is gaining more favor around the league should not be a turn-off to people who watch a lot of baseball, it should be an exciting new way to understand the game. i often use analogy to illuminate my points, so the most apt analogy i can use is the resistance to the idea of the sun-centered solar system that galileo ran up against. now, no one has staged a mass burning of baseball abstracts or anything, but you get the point.