Nothing will happen. Even if they replace the sod, it won't take by Sunday. They played on a sheet of ice in Minnesota...they'll play on some bad grass in Chicago. That's just the Green Bay press whining. Unlike the Chicago press, the Packers beat writers aren't fans of the team. Objective journalism. Who knew such a thing existed? are you freaking kidding me? i hope you're being saracstic, the packer fan base and media coverage are indistinguishable from one another. i've never met a group of fans or a media base that was more rah-rah about the home team. chicago will tear their own team apart, even being a bears town. Give me an example of a Bears reporter who tore the team apart. Holmes, Zaidman, Dickerson, Biggs, and Mullin are all pretty big homers. Especially the first three. brad biggs, jeff dickerson, and john mullin are all beat guys. zach zaidman is the score bears beat guy. i'm sure they'd be beloved on the sideline or in the locker room if they came on the air or wrote an article tearing them apart. holmes is the floating radio guy, but spends a lot of time with the team in bourbonais and can't afford to make enemies in the organization. if you want to listen to criticism, listen to the regular guys like boers and bernstein, boers is about as objective as they come, the whole "who you crappin????" segment is built on his antagonism of ditka. and i guarantee that no green bay station has the equivalent of a dan bernstein, a guy who begs chicago meatballs to come on his show so he can ruthlessly eviscerate them. they bring on hub arkush, a notorious bears-axe-grinder, to tell us how inept the bears will look this week. dan mcneil and matt spiegel aren't much more positive. you think those guys are rah-rah guys? that's unbelievable, and they're are the drive-time people. these are personalities that you do not see in a less than big city. and you will not find anyone like them in packerland, the land of the rah-rahs.