mccracken said "more of an unknown" (meaning harder to evaluate, one would assume) and hughes criticized him for it. i honestly don't know what you need to admit you're embarrassing yourself. As compared to a college player, a HS player... * is less physically mature. That's known. * is almost certainly facing inferior competition. That's known. * has less experience. That's known. * will require more development time. That's known. * faces a greater risk of arm injury, if he's a pitcher. That's known. All of these factors, and probably several others I'm leaving out, make the HS kid a greater risk. So you do a classic risk/reward evaluation, and fill out your draft board, with the HS kids slotting in with the college kids however your risk/reward analysis, combined with your organization's risk tolerance, dictates. So what is it that's unknown in this scenario? Between the scouting grades and the statistical data, you have all the information you need to make a fully informed decision. That is what I believe Gary Hughes' point was. so it's known that high school players are more of an unknown. i'm glad we have that cleared up. what are you, dothraki?