but that doesn't mean he can't be an effective pitcher. just b/c you can't consider him a prospect doesn't mean that his career is over at 26. How about putting the Hill dillemma in this context...none of us can predicte the future, so all we can do is analyze trends. How many pitchers who were struggling to break into the bigs at 26 that were relatively healthy up to that point wound up having a successful career? None come to mind. I'm not counting on Hill ever contributing anything to this organization. Doesn't mean he won't, but Hendry would be foolish not to trade him if an opportunity came along to trade him for a need. lots of guys have sucked until they reached 26 only to turn it around. the difference between hill and those guys is that they sucked in the bigs while hill took his lumps in the minors. Maybe, but those guys that turned it around aren't in the same group as Hill. They were at least able to prove they had something to offer in the bigs while Hill has been blocked the last three years by guys like Rusch, Estes or others, while guys like Leicester, Wellemeyer, Wuertz, and others have gotten a shot. The Cubs have given plenty of young guys shots in various roles the last few years, to the argument that he's been "blocked" really isn't legitimate either. Hill should be compared to other guys who were struggling to make the majors at 26 who had clean bills of health. The prognosis isn't good.