Oh good, the old, "if it was the right move the Cubs would have done it" theory. Nice to see that one back again. The answer is that the Cubs organization is not always right. Soto could definitely have flopped, and I don't think he had as good a chance at giving solid production in his first full time stint in the MLB, but he deserved a shot after Barrett was traded. He didn't get it. I'm sure Kendall will continue to get chances for a while, and he should. There is a reasonable chance that he could play well for two months, considering his past performance. There is also the possibility that he sucks as badly as he did in the first half. I don't think we can have a definitive answer about his second half performance based on his couple of games with the Cubs so far. But if, approaching mid to late August, he shows no signs of turning around, it would be a mistake for Lou not to ask to give Soto a shot. Maybe they want Soto to catch one more full year and not platoon since Hill had developed a good relationship with Zambrano. If Zambrano is gone, no need for Hill...or even if he stays, Soto can take Hill's place, although I doubt kendell comes back next year. I still don't see why its such a shock to think we fans are possibly over-valuing Soto.