17 Seconds

no way. once they're out of it they'll rally with some "bears pride" wins and then take a db late in the first round

now this will be overturned and they'll kill the rest of the clock....and then score

that's not really true at all.

well if they lose i hope they lose by about 30. they deserve to be humiliated.

it's a good thing we used those timeouts

not only do they get the first down, but you just gave them a bunch of extra time.

oh my god can anybody catch the ball this team is completely embarrassing themselves on national tv in the biggest game of the season

4 straight goal line stands

it's okay though because we'll get an inside run with forte when its 3rd and 9 later on this drive

and of course it;s berrian, to make it even worse. they deserve to lose this game already

3rd and long and you run 1st and goal inside the 1 and you pass sweet

this play calling is making me sad

no way that should be a suspension. it was dirty but he barely touched him. my grandma could have taken that hit better than gus

keep in mind this is a guy who knocked himself out during a touchdown celebration

gus was either faking it or he's the softest player in the nfl

that was definitately a dirty/late hit, but it seemed like frerrote was miling it. that or he is extremely fraill. be basically just bumped into him and gus went flying for some reason

i don't care how good peterson is... that was just atrocious tackling.

yeah i'm an idiot

Wait, I thought it was dead right when the first guy touched it?

lovie what hell... your guys had a full tv timeout to look at that play and realize it wasn't even close, yet you still waste a timeout on it

You could tell as soon as the ball hit his hands it was going to be 6

He has a family

This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread I think it's pretty significant that they are trying to move Lee. Think of the second order effects besides Peavy... We don't know that they're "trying" to move Lee. They might just be "willing" to move him. There's a big difference. Either way, the context in which Churchill told me that implied that it was part of a Peavy trade, so I posted it in here. Earlier this month, one of Chicago's beat writers (I don't remember which) said Hendry was going to try to trade Lee, so this seems to corroborate that. That's part of why it's significant. What were his exact words? Again, there is a huge difference between "trying to trade" someone and just listening to offers. I remember the article you're talking about and I think it was more of a "they're open to trading Lee" type thing. Do you remember the exact quote or the article? I think you're splitting hairs at this point. I don't recall the exact quote because I can't recall which writer it was. I can't recall if it was a trib, suntimes, or herald writer either. Anyone else out there remember? I don't really think it's splitting hairs. I'm sure there are a lot of guys on the team that they'd be willing to trade if it helped them get somebody else they really wanted. That doesn't mean they're trying to trade them. I'm not sure which of those categories Lee falls into, but I bet it's the latter. The team displayed unsolicited interest in trading Lee previously. I think the intent is pretty clear, they don't want to be stuck with him for the rest of his contract. Again, where did they show unsolicited interest? I haven't seen that anywhere. I think they only will trade it if it's necessary to improve the team. I don't they'd do it just to dump salary.

This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread I think it's pretty significant that they are trying to move Lee. Think of the second order effects besides Peavy... We don't know that they're "trying" to move Lee. They might just be "willing" to move him. There's a big difference. Either way, the context in which Churchill told me that implied that it was part of a Peavy trade, so I posted it in here. Earlier this month, one of Chicago's beat writers (I don't remember which) said Hendry was going to try to trade Lee, so this seems to corroborate that. That's part of why it's significant. What were his exact words? Again, there is a huge difference between "trying to trade" someone and just listening to offers. I remember the article you're talking about and I think it was more of a "they're open to trading Lee" type thing. Do you remember the exact quote or the article? I think you're splitting hairs at this point. I don't recall the exact quote because I can't recall which writer it was. I can't recall if it was a trib, suntimes, or herald writer either. Anyone else out there remember? I don't really think it's splitting hairs. I'm sure there are a lot of guys on the team that they'd be willing to trade if it helped them get somebody else they really wanted. That doesn't mean they're trying to trade them. I'm not sure which of those categories Lee falls into, but I bet it's the latter.

This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread I think it's pretty significant that they are trying to move Lee. Think of the second order effects besides Peavy... We don't know that they're "trying" to move Lee. They might just be "willing" to move him. There's a big difference. Either way, the context in which Churchill told me that implied that it was part of a Peavy trade, so I posted it in here. Earlier this month, one of Chicago's beat writers (I don't remember which) said Hendry was going to try to trade Lee, so this seems to corroborate that. That's part of why it's significant. What were his exact words? Again, there is a huge difference between "trying to trade" someone and just listening to offers. I remember the article you're talking about and I think it was more of a "they're open to trading Lee" type thing. Do you remember the exact quote or the article?