Jump to content
North Side Baseball

17 Seconds

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    23,817
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by 17 Seconds

  1. oh my god can anybody catch the ball this team is completely embarrassing themselves on national tv in the biggest game of the season
  2. 4 straight goal line stands
  3. it's okay though because we'll get an inside run with forte when its 3rd and 9 later on this drive
  4. and of course it;s berrian, to make it even worse. they deserve to lose this game already
  5. 3rd and long and you run 1st and goal inside the 1 and you pass sweet
  6. this play calling is making me sad
  7. no way that should be a suspension. it was dirty but he barely touched him. my grandma could have taken that hit better than gus
  8. keep in mind this is a guy who knocked himself out during a touchdown celebration
  9. gus was either faking it or he's the softest player in the nfl
  10. that was definitately a dirty/late hit, but it seemed like frerrote was miling it. that or he is extremely fraill. be basically just bumped into him and gus went flying for some reason
  11. i don't care how good peterson is... that was just atrocious tackling.
  12. Wait, I thought it was dead right when the first guy touched it?
  13. lovie what hell... your guys had a full tv timeout to look at that play and realize it wasn't even close, yet you still waste a timeout on it
  14. You could tell as soon as the ball hit his hands it was going to be 6
  15. This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread I think it's pretty significant that they are trying to move Lee. Think of the second order effects besides Peavy... We don't know that they're "trying" to move Lee. They might just be "willing" to move him. There's a big difference. Either way, the context in which Churchill told me that implied that it was part of a Peavy trade, so I posted it in here. Earlier this month, one of Chicago's beat writers (I don't remember which) said Hendry was going to try to trade Lee, so this seems to corroborate that. That's part of why it's significant. What were his exact words? Again, there is a huge difference between "trying to trade" someone and just listening to offers. I remember the article you're talking about and I think it was more of a "they're open to trading Lee" type thing. Do you remember the exact quote or the article? I think you're splitting hairs at this point. I don't recall the exact quote because I can't recall which writer it was. I can't recall if it was a trib, suntimes, or herald writer either. Anyone else out there remember? I don't really think it's splitting hairs. I'm sure there are a lot of guys on the team that they'd be willing to trade if it helped them get somebody else they really wanted. That doesn't mean they're trying to trade them. I'm not sure which of those categories Lee falls into, but I bet it's the latter. The team displayed unsolicited interest in trading Lee previously. I think the intent is pretty clear, they don't want to be stuck with him for the rest of his contract. Again, where did they show unsolicited interest? I haven't seen that anywhere. I think they only will trade it if it's necessary to improve the team. I don't they'd do it just to dump salary.
  16. This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread I think it's pretty significant that they are trying to move Lee. Think of the second order effects besides Peavy... We don't know that they're "trying" to move Lee. They might just be "willing" to move him. There's a big difference. Either way, the context in which Churchill told me that implied that it was part of a Peavy trade, so I posted it in here. Earlier this month, one of Chicago's beat writers (I don't remember which) said Hendry was going to try to trade Lee, so this seems to corroborate that. That's part of why it's significant. What were his exact words? Again, there is a huge difference between "trying to trade" someone and just listening to offers. I remember the article you're talking about and I think it was more of a "they're open to trading Lee" type thing. Do you remember the exact quote or the article? I think you're splitting hairs at this point. I don't recall the exact quote because I can't recall which writer it was. I can't recall if it was a trib, suntimes, or herald writer either. Anyone else out there remember? I don't really think it's splitting hairs. I'm sure there are a lot of guys on the team that they'd be willing to trade if it helped them get somebody else they really wanted. That doesn't mean they're trying to trade them. I'm not sure which of those categories Lee falls into, but I bet it's the latter.
  17. This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread I think it's pretty significant that they are trying to move Lee. Think of the second order effects besides Peavy... We don't know that they're "trying" to move Lee. They might just be "willing" to move him. There's a big difference. Either way, the context in which Churchill told me that implied that it was part of a Peavy trade, so I posted it in here. Earlier this month, one of Chicago's beat writers (I don't remember which) said Hendry was going to try to trade Lee, so this seems to corroborate that. That's part of why it's significant. What were his exact words? Again, there is a huge difference between "trying to trade" someone and just listening to offers. I remember the article you're talking about and I think it was more of a "they're open to trading Lee" type thing. Do you remember the exact quote or the article?
  18. This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread I think it's pretty significant that they are trying to move Lee. Think of the second order effects besides Peavy... We don't know that they're "trying" to move Lee. They might just be "willing" to move him. There's a big difference. Either way, the context in which Churchill told me that implied that it was part of a Peavy trade, so I posted it in here.
  19. I don't care what anyone says...I like Drew Gooden. I liked him when he was on the Magic too
  20. He wanted out and last year midseason he basically said there was no way he'd play for the Bulls this year
  21. This should have it's own thread, not be in the Peavy thread. Well he probably would have been traded as part of a Peavy deal, or at least a in a move that sets it up. Either way, I don't really think that info deserves it's own thread
  22. It's odd for Churchill to name his source outright like this. Why Does Lee's agent want this out ? My guess is that nobody would believe some guy on an internet message board. Then again, he did share other info with me in the e-mail who he claimed was from a very well known/high up source and told me to keep it to myself because the guy told it to him in confidence (nothing important though, so don't even ask.)
×
×
  • Create New...