Nope, the fact that his numbers dramatically drop when he's moved from the leadoff spot. His worst two seasons (by far) over the past 7 seasons were the back to back years in Texas where they tried to bat him in the middle of the order. Lou bats him leadoff because of this. We've seen him try him down in the order and have no patience when he struggles there to start out. This is caused by Soriano's track record. I don't like paying 17 million a year for an injury prone .890 OPS power hitter who doesn't bat in the middle of the order. I'm not sure where you get your numbers, but I don't really care. I generally ignore signing bonuses or spread them out over the course of a contract when considering a player's value. I don't like lumping them all into the first year. Doesn't make much sense to me to do it that way, though, with Soriano, it's clear that he took less in Y1 b/c of the signing bonus. Either way, I don't care. I think it's perfectly legit to say he's earned his contract to date based on the way I amortize the bonus of the amounts he's been paid. The big problem most people had with Soriano's contract wasn't the first couple years, it's paying him $18m when he's in his late 30s. If you don't agree, fine, but the bottom line is not that he's getting 17m a year. That's just not true, no matter how many times you say it. As for batting order, in addition to the fact that's it's almost irrelevant where he bats, I strongly disagree that he'd be worse if he were hitting 3-5 rather than first. I know his history. The board had a huge debate about this when he was signed. I just don't agree that his history automatically leads to the conclusion you're drawing. But it IS 17 mil A year. He get a 136 mil contract for 8 years. You can draw it up however you want it, when his contract is up he'll end up averaging 17 mil for every year he plays, period. So okay, it's "well he's earned his contract up to this point, although to make up for that being possible...we're going to get raped annually in the second half of the contract". I think that's more appropriate since it tells the whole story. And I still haven't heard a reason for Soriano's 2 crappy years in Texas (sandwiched between 5 significantly better ones) that is more likely than it being due to him not batting leadoff. I'm going to believe what is most believable. Obviously it was a different hitter those 2 hitters. What was it? He was sick for 2 years? A 2 year brak from steroids? Givne the fact that he's repeatedly said he feels myuch more comfortable batting leadoff, I think it's easy to see what the most logical reason is for him sucking those 2 years. Even if that's not the reason though, it almost doesn't matter....because the reason he's batting leadoff now is because he's given that impression to Lou. Lou doesn't bat him leadoff because he likes him there, he bats him leadoff because he doesn't feel Soriano will produce in the middle of the order. And no, the difference between a power hitter batting behind the pitcher and batting in the middle of the order is not irrelevant.