Give me two starters. The difference in cost isn't that bad, and it should be obvious I'm leaning on the side that thinks we should spend more prospect capital than less. When I look at Cabrera/Brown/Steele, I think there's an optimistic path of them being fully stretched out, a middle path of them being reliable bullpen options, and a pessimistic path of them not being available at all. I'm choosing the middle option and saying that the rehabbing guys (those three, plus Palencia/Harvey as a top tier, Maton/Milner/Roberts as a middle tier) is more than enough to overhaul the bullpen.
On the starting side, Cabrera hasn't done enough for me to want him near a playoff start, and you also can't guarantee the health of Boyd and Shota in two months, whether it be actual injury or just plain fatigue. Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results or whatever.
I believe everyone listed below, barring setbacks, is expected to be mostly ready to go come sometime in September, if not before. It's pitching, so there will be setbacks, but this, paired with our offensive guys, I'd take against anyone.
SP1 Boyd
SP2 Detmers
SP3 Shota
SP4 Rental (Gausman, Peralta, would be fine with someone splitting the difference between that tier and Peterson/Assad)
Bullpen: Steele, Brown, Cabrera, Palencia, Webb, Rolison, pick two from Maton/Milner/Roberts/Hollowell/Ferguson/Thielbar/Harvey
When one of the starters inevitably goes down, your fourth playoff spot becomes some sort of piggyback start from the Steele/Brown/Cabrera group and Rea or Assad gets the call. Starters can always pitch in relief. Relievers can't become starters. If the difference is giving up Owen Ayers instead of Jonathan Long or whatever, don't care.