I don't disagree conceptually(I prefer to think of Hendricks as a '4 at best' when constructing my rotation), what I'm trying to articulate here is that with so many guys in that group with no options, there isn't an opportunity to wait on injury/performance attrition. So you sign a 2nd starter(let's call it Hammel for simplicity), and then you have this group heading into spring training: FA#1, Arrieta, Hendricks, Hammel, Turner, Straily, Doubront, Wood. So now you have until the end of ST to narrow that to 5, and Straily/Hendricks are the only ones that can go to Iowa. Hendricks appears to have a stranglehold on a job, so even if we get 'lucky' and Straily isn't that great, now you've got 4 guys for 2 spots and none of them have options. Maybe someone gets hurt, maybe a bullpen spot opens up, but even then you're likely only postponing the same decision a couple weeks. You have to get rid of a couple guys, likely for little/nothing, and now your depth is down to your starting 5 + Straily, maybe one more if you got 'lucky' and someone is hurt longer term. And the only new information that we have to go on is Spring Training, which will be helpful but not irredeemable proof either. Bottom line, adding a 2nd SP isn't bad, but if he isn't really good, the impact is muted quite a bit because you're going to be forced to cut bait with at least one, probably two guys who have a similar profile. EDIT: Right off the bat, our current RP stalwarts cut out a lot of the available spots(Rondon, Ramirez, Strop, Wright, Grimm). Realistically that's two more spots and looking at other relievers, Schlitter, Parker, Rosscup, Vizcaino, I can't think of a significant one without options. So there seems to be the required flexibility that pitcher loading would require. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk