Honestly had to look up who the hell Buddy Carlyle was. Maybe there's some other 4 decade club candidates hanging around as career minor leaguers. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1. Two pieces of leavened dough or loaf of leavened dough that is split. 2. Meat/filling that is sliced, pulled, or spread. And does not contain meat ingredients which are ground or packaged in a natural or artificial casing. 3. Dough must be cooked prior to inclusion of filling (aka no tamales, calzones, or pizzas) 4. Put in some type of scientific mumbo jumbo about the ratio of sugar butter and flour to exclude cakes as the source of leavened dough. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a stretch to call crust bread, but even then cooking the toppings/ingredients at the same time you cook the raw dough would definitely disqualify for sandwich status. Usually I'd also dock for not having two sides to the bread though there are a couple exceptions for open faced sandwiches. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The bottom 4 on my roster put up 4 points. Luckily I had a big week elsewhere and pulled out the W but that's not sustainable. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pulled pork on a bun isn't a sandwich? I like your first part. Then just add it has to be on a risen bread and I'm happy with the definition. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow I don't know why but that didn't look like Brown at all. 98 looked familiar and I couldn't reconcile in my brain what looked like a RB on the field with a fatty in the 90s. I shouldn't drink. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Man I'm so disappointed Kyle Rudolph went down. No, wait I'm not cuz I picked up Larry Donnell. Where's the Fantasy Brag thread? Oh [expletive] you DeSean Jackson for your o-fer. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd like to be all meatbally and say he should man up and play with a club but I think Bostic with two hands is better anyways. Get well Shea. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh it'd be crazy and wouldn't happen ever, but maybe they could at least do some trades to please the meatballs. Like hey we'll retire Singletary's number guys but we're taking back Hewitt, Galimore, and McAfee because seriously. I'm still confused on Ditka but I guess they figured no one wears numbers in the 80s anymore except TEs and waiver-wire WRs so sure why not. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, there should be no retired numbers, but I will take half as a start. I'm okay with Payton Butkus, maybe Sayers and Grange and a few others, but even then I'd be okay with zero as long as that was just the norm and you still found a way to honor the true greats of your franchise. Also you should never get one for dying (sorry Piccolo but the annual award is more than enough) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think how they handled Singletary's number was good and how they should handle Urlacher. Unofficially retire it for about 20 seasons and then just let some veteran use it again and move on. Also lets unretire about half the numbers. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just air the games on whatever public access channels normally air HS plays and [expletive]. Or on the TV guide channel Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hopefully they sit Garza down and let him know how important he has been to the franchise and that they will allow him to save face by being injured the rest of the year and an org job when he retires. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or if I roll the dice and start Charles these are my FA options to get a backup for Monday night (carrying an extra D so I could) Amendola, Thompkins, Lafell, Bowe, Avery, McKnight Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So with Charles questionable and no other Monday night option I think I have to just sit him again. With that being the case 1 RB 1 Flex Pierre Thomas, Joquie Bell, DeSean Jackson, Terrance Williams Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uh, what's wrong with his eyes. Those are corpse-eyes. Voldermort eyes is what I thought the first time I saw that pic. But the smile of a pretty frat boy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The points allowed is good and we're creating turnovers. However it seems we're giving up a lot of yards so I'm not sure if the PA is a sign of defensive improvement or when we aren't facing Geno Smiths a lot of those FGs become redzone TDs. I'm not fearing a repeat of the '13 defense but still skeptical. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And if it's this verification idea, it solves nothing of the Cubs' 2015 dilemma since they have 70 games with no local channel to validate. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk