Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. Dak Prescott First 15: 307-451, 3630, 24 TD, 4 INT, 105.65 Since: 366-586, 3859, 24 TD, 15 INT, 87.47 Marcus Mariota First 15: 297-477, 3541, 23, 14, 88.74 Since: 511-831, 6138, 35, 22, 87.11 Jameis Winston First 15: 283-488, 3717, 22, 13, 86.07 Since: 656-1056, 7919, 47, 31, 87,7 Any others from the past several years who have started at least 15 games? ETA- Derek Carr 330-563, 3112, 20, 11, 77.66 1133-1795, 12514, 85, 38, 90.7 Blake Bortles 302-515, 3091, 12, 19, 68.35 1084-1825, 12544, 83, 47, 84.6 Brock Osweiler (not incl games with minor stats) 326-543, 3500, 18, 14, 79.28 239-410, 2494, 12, 13, 72.55 Geno Smith 230-416, 2856, 12, 21, 65.34 292-486, 3318, 17, 15, 79.40 Trevor Sieman 306-514, 3620, 20, 11, 85.09 189-321, 2066, 10, 13, 71.48 Aggregate (granted some survivor-ship bias) 2992-2980, 33,723 yards, 183 TD, 132 INT, 81.57 5007-8164, 57,363 yards, 370 TD, 207 INT, 87.01 So young QBs will get a little better after their first 15 games. What might the next season and a half or so look like for Mitch on average? 448-711, 4,735 yards, 18 TD, 16 INT 81.69 Let's hope he does better than average.
  2. Dak Prescott First 15: 307-451, 3630, 24 TD, 4 INT, 105.65 Since: 366-586, 3859, 24 TD, 15 INT, 87.47 Marcus Mariota First 15: 297-477, 3541, 23, 14, 88.74 Since: 511-831, 6138, 35, 22, 87.11 Jameis Winston First 15: 283-488, 3717, 22, 13, 86.07 Since: 656-1056, 7919, 47, 31, 87,7 Any others from the past several years who have started at least 15 games? ETA- Derek Carr 330-563, 3112, 20, 11, 77.66 1133-1795, 12514, 85, 38, 90.7 Blake Bortles 302-515, 3091, 12, 19, 68.35 1084-1825, 12544, 83, 47, 84.6 Brock Osweiler (not incl games with minor stats) 326-543, 3500, 18, 14, 79.28 239-410, 2494, 12, 13, 72.55 Geno Smith 230-416, 2856, 12, 21, 65.34 292-486, 3318, 17, 15, 79.40 Trevor Sieman 306-514, 3620, 20, 11, 85.09 189-321, 2066, 10, 13, 71.48
  3. Yea, but that (and the Brees one above) was like 20+ years ago. Passing stats should be up.
  4. Nice. I'm sure you could play with arbitrary endpoints to make some other point seem more significant, but still hopeful to look at. Surprised that Mitch isn't as far behind on attempts from Goff's pace.
  5. Goff and Wentz were pretty bad in their first ~15 starts, right? Wentz struggled by the end of his rookie year but he for sure showed flashes at some points during that season that showed he might be something. Goff is a good comparison but he got off to a great start in his 2nd year (including a 292 yard, 3 TD game in week 3) and never looked back. Do people think Trubisky is close to turning the corner, because I don't. Just eyeballing it, Goff really took off on game 16 with a 146 passer rating game and his two lowest games since then are a 79 and 93 rating game. Mitch's high point thru 15 hasn't been as high yet, but just eyeballing it, it might be close overall. Maybe I'll sum up and plug in the stats later and find out. ETA - Wentz from game 16 onward has had about 4 mid 80s passer rating games as his low. Games 6-15 of his career were down overall. Will add him and a few other young guys to the thru 15 game list later. Let's hope that game 16 is the turnaround point for Mitch, haha.
  6. Some might say he loves missing TD's. Lawl.
  7. Yea, so little redeemable from yesterday from Mitch. At least in the first two games you could point to his positives on the scripted first drives, or a couple pretty throws. Yesterday was bad... basically two drives that had any rhythm, and even those took some bailing out by the Cards D.
  8. Are you only talking about today, because the first two weeks had some bad safety help, which led to some big plays. Talking about all season. Bad safety help isnt blown coverage, it's bad safety help. Either way its not elite.
  9. Way too many broken coverages over 3 games to be elite, IMO. 2 today we're on Trevathan vs a TE and RB. Only other one was on Callahan. Are you only talking about today, because the first two weeks had some bad safety help, which led to some big plays.
  10. Front 7, maybe DBs had 3 picks and held a hall of fame WR to almost nothing. Entire unit is elite. Way too many broken coverages over 3 games to be elite, IMO.
  11. So when was the last time they were in 1st place?
  12. Gotta do one or the other there. Who was it that effed it up so bad a couple years ago and basically did neither, I want to say against the Packers...
  13. Woulda been big for my fantasy chances this week. I'll take the final one point though.
  14. Woulda been big for my fantasy chances this week.
  15. Uh here's hoping 43 seconds leads to another INT or sack for my fantasy team and not the Bears blowing it.
  16. But when two bad teams play both cant lose.
  17. Or at least in possession of 1st place for a week.
  18. So many wide open receivers in just 3 weeks.
  19. Just field position yourselves into a win, guys. Come on D.
  20. Sherrick McManis actually playing D? Huh.
  21. Okay there was a little rhythm on that drive (though should have ended in a pick). Let's get a 3 and out now.
×
×
  • Create New...