Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. The secondary logo is basically perfection.
  2. Rumors are that Snyder and Chico both want military theme to the name. Redtails seems like such a no brainer if that's the desire, but not surprising at all they they'd go a much more traditional and generic theme like that if so.
  3. Washington Team to be Named Later.
  4. Add to that, Jed on ESPN1000 just now: Certainly not "everyone" will be able to watch games on Marquee. Even if they make a last minute deal with YouTube, that still leaves Dish subscribers out. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk I mean everyone COULD go sign up with Hulu today so he's already technically correct, right?
  5. Alright luckily it seems to happen after I've seen the original tweet so I know somethings out of place. But I figure eventually I might make a reply that makes zero sense because of a sneaky tweet switch haha.
  6. Anyone have glitchy tweet issues. For example a tweet from earlier in the thread loads into a totally different post? I've seen it twice this past week. Tim I took a screenshot, but loading it somewhere to host on the web is kind of a pain, I can just email it to you to show you what I'm talking about if you're curious.
  7. Yuupp. Some [expletive] unity message overshadowing the actual message suuucks.
  8. https://news.yahoo.com/marquee-sports-network-ads-target-193700055.html They haven't managed to reach me. Are you even selling my data FB? Wtf?
  9. You've never heard of this? It's about trying to get those subscribers to demand it or leave, as to mount pressure. But how are they supposed to see the ads? Good question. They'd have to buy airtime or ad space where they think they can target Cubs fans/YTTV subscribers. Normally they just plop it on their own channel, but that's when they're negotiating to keep the rights.
  10. Attack ads against an organization you're trying to negotiate with?You've never heard of this? It's about trying to get those subscribers to demand it or leave, as to mount pressure.
  11. If the following was true, this Flood guy is a dummy and NBC is gonna end up settling with JR. There's enough other differences that this would be frivelous otherwise. Of course I could also totally see Roenick basically making that up in his head.
  12. if i took 35 *swings* my body would crumple into dust Well even at 4 at bats a game, that's max just 12 swings a game, likely less as I'm frozen in fear most of the time. So I could work up to those 35 swings over a few games at least. I'd have to not take BP though to reserve any strength for the ABs, though. At least until like mid season when I've developed some sort of core.
  13. Yes, there are certainly non pro athletes that could muster 35 hits, but if we're talking the average Joe, the median person is only getting on base because an errant pitch was rifled into their ribs.
  14. 35 hits? I'd be happy if I made contact 35 times.
  15. There's Deutsche Bank loans for that.
  16. They got one last use out of that letterhead though.
  17. Biggest thing I remember from that season was rushing home from work and watching Javy's debut in a season where I watched almost no games. A Chicago treasure form day 1.
  18. I wasn't aware of the ability to lock in a specific % of the cap. If that exists, that obviously helps with any downside. Per a few posts after this, guarantees matter a ton as well. If not a lot is guaranteed, he's potentially in a position where they just have endless team options (in effect). Been pretty busy the past few days, but I'll be interested to dig into details. Still, long term contracts are bad if not accompanied with significant guarantees. Eh, for an NFL QB of his level/age/accomplishment he’s going to have to suffer some significant injury or career altering incident for them to ever cut him. Other NFL positions, sure, but as long as he’s a top 12 or so QB under the deal he isn’t getting cut. If he's not cut one of those scenarios is where he is criminally underpaid. Or he becomes too expensive and is cut because the cap flattens and he never sees huge portions of the unguaranteed money. The structure and total guarantees matter A LOT.
  19. That seems likely dumb on his part, but we'll see. The rumors are it’s going to approach $500 mil and they’ll tie it to him getting a % of the cap (I’ve seen 16-18%) so he gets the team/league revenue benefit, why is it dumb to not lock that in? The downside is appreciably higher, imo, going short term and risking injury or whatever and costing yourself $100+ mil than it is to try and pick up a little more money every 3-4 years to maybe make a couple $10 mil more a year over 10 years. I wasn't aware of the ability to lock in a specific % of the cap. If that exists, that obviously helps with any downside. Per a few posts after this, guarantees matter a ton as well. If not a lot is guaranteed, he's potentially in a position where they just have endless team options (in effect). Been pretty busy the past few days, but I'll be interested to dig into details. Still, long term contracts are bad if not accompanied with significant guarantees.
  20. That seems likely dumb on his part, but we'll see.
  21. Its a cool concept. I wonder if them keeping some of the imagery like that (like the feathers and the face paint by the eye) would not be enough to please those who want to see change. Many many years ago I saw a cool concept on sportslogos.net that was a Blackhawk helicopter concept. I imagine some sort of change womt be too far away for the Hawks. I know they used to have an established relationship with a local Native American advocacy group that kind of deflected some criticism, but sounds like that relationship was terminated and the current director has zero interest in establishing a relationship.
  22. Those were simpler times. Had to be more than a decade ago. Also re: that gif, best cold open ever. Just went and re-watched.
  23. One oft cited rumor I've heard was that Wade and Bosh were set on Chicago, but they pitched to Lebron about teaming up one last time. When he agreed, they went to Miami. This story contradicts that a bit. Chicago with any two of those guys I think ends up better than 2 for 4. Chicago with just Lebron might have as well (plus whatever other guy/guys they would have been able to pair with Lebron that offseason).
  24. My first thought is: Minch thinks he throws harder than Marquez? Lefty reliever vs starter.
×
×
  • Create New...