Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. This is gonna be one of those weird ass games we look back on in a decade. Especially if it ends up being Rodgers last Bears-Packers game.
  2. Officially worth the pick lol
  3. Its been true since the end of the Lovie era except for 2018.
  4. I'm obviously broke because I just assume they'll blow this, but I think they'll cover tonight.
  5. This is a weird game so far.
  6. Trace is more than believable in a president role. He's damn near ideal with his experience and connections. Ideally I'd probably want someone with some tram side experience. His is players/coach side. You've seen the agent route in basketball a little, but weren't those guys who started their own firms? I don't think thats Trace. But whatever business/team side he lacks, he's presumably gonna come in under Ted for a while still anwyays and he could slowly add that aspect to his knowledge base. But I'd gladly take him. Whatever he lacks it's beleivable he can build on it. Definitely seems well respected. And he isn't just a GM-personnel type that someone wants to call President.
  7. Yea it's almost certainly not true, but the statement would basically be identical whether it was true or not. I've seen Armstrong floated before, but this is the first article that's tried to pass it as an actual thing and not just throwing out ideas. I often mock the "Bears should hire a Football man as President" takes, but Armstrong is actually somewhat believable in a Pres role, working on both business matters and oversight of a GM, without actually just being the GM. Presumably Ted would still be CEO, but more focused on stadium deal now and perhaps handing over the mantle to Armstrong in time when he decides to retire.
  8. This isn't gonna stop. Jeez.
  9. Oakland, Chicago for sure. Minnesota, Jacksonville seem more likely than not to have openings Fangio I'd put at 40/60 he's out, but a collapse down the stretch and their desire for a splash on offense could get him fired I think Judge is safe in NYG The wildcards are Seattle (do they fire a SB winning coach?), New Orleans (Payton want a change of scenery?), and Tampa (Arians retirement?), Is Jacksonville talk about Meyer quitting or being fired?
  10. With college head coaches signing absurd extensions the talk of hot young coaches coming up from college is no longer an option. Or NFL teams are just gonna start competing at that level. There's some speculation these college deals are gonna force pro teams to compete.
  11. Also it could be a pretty light year for openings. Definitely Chicago and Oakland. Probably Minnesota. Maybe New York Giants? Who else?
  12. Seems to be the typical sort of list you see every offseason.
  13. Yes believe it or not Yep from worst defenses in Bears history to a 10/95 contract in about 7 years. What a turnaround. Makes me think Nagy could be signing a 150M contract in a decade if he wants to try out the college route.
  14. Fwiw, it was a decent listen. A little less specific about the Bears centric issues and they weave in and out of Brandon's personal business and leadership. Maybe the most interesting part is Marc says he felt in hindsight he wish he made the hard decision to cut bait with some of the old guard who were never gonna buy in to a different leadership way from Lovie. (he also admits he doesn't think Lovie should have even been fired, maybe a lesson for coaches who may walk into a tough situation like that). He spent a lot of time with guys like Martellus and others and getting their buy in and they did, but it was too much culture shock to many others, particularly the D. Looking at the defensive roster from 12 to 13: Idonije was gone. Urlacher was gone. Peppers was around in 2013, but he never came across as a malcontent. Tillman was there, by all accounts he's a wonderful person, don't see him making a big stink. That leaves Lance Briggs and Tim Jennings. I can definitely see Briggs, in particular, not buying in and it was kind of his team in 2013. Plus, I know from things Urlacher has said in the past, it wasn't a great situation once Cutler got there. I think the vets on defense saw the writing on the wall that the long goal was to make this an offensive driven team and Lovie wasn't long for the HC position (he actually lasted longer than they thought he would) and that meant their status on the team would be in jeopardy. Throw in Urlacher was allowed to walk after 2012 and they probably felt justified in their prophecy. It probably didn't help that Trestman was such a slug of a personality, but guys like Briggs and Urlacher would have only bought in if you brought in a Hall of Fame level communicator/sellsman at that point, and even then it would have been only when they felt like it. In hindsight, if they were going to field 2 of the worst defenses in franchise history, they would have been better off cutting/trading all those guys with Lovie. Yea it was a series of bad moves from the forced Lovie-Emery marriage for a year. Emery pissing of Urlacher, and then not resetting hard on the D. Not saying no coach could have navigated it, but it wasn't an easy spot and Marc certainly wasn't gonna be the guy. But even down to his DC hire of Tucker, who has subsequently done well at the college level and giving them a relatively younger/hunger roster is a kind of interesting what if.
  15. Trestman is a lawyer? wow Not just a pretty face.
  16. I guess he did a podcast with Marshall recently and they addresseed some of those things though and I guess are more normal now. Basically Marshall felt he would have done better with the now younger generation of players. And that Bears team, especially its leaders were older, so even in about 7 years there's a pretty big generational gap between that Bears team and maybe a young team in 2018, perhaps with a young QB in need of molding too. In true hot take form, I haven't actually gotten around to pod yet, but it sounded interesting though; https://www.law.miami.edu/about/leadership-gameplan-podcast Fwiw, it was a decent listen. A little less specific about the Bears centric issues and they weave in and out of Brandon's personal business and leadership. Maybe the most interesting part is Marc says he felt in hindsight he wish he made the hard decision to cut bait with some of the old guard who were never gonna buy in to a different leadership way from Lovie. (he also admits he doesn't think Lovie should have even been fired, maybe a lesson for coaches who may walk into a tough situation like that). He spent a lot of time with guys like Martellus and others and getting their buy in and they did, but it was too much culture shock to many others, particularly the D.
  17. I guess he did a podcast with Marshall recently and they addresseed some of those things though and I guess are more normal now. Basically Marshall felt he would have done better with the now younger generation of players. And that Bears team, especially its leaders were older, so even in about 7 years there's a pretty big generational gap between that Bears team and maybe a young team in 2018, perhaps with a young QB in need of molding too. In true hot take form, I haven't actually gotten around to pod yet, but it sounded interesting though; https://www.law.miami.edu/about/leadership-gameplan-podcast
  18. Hi they weren't really above average in 2014 #16 in DVOA, iirc Okay but they were really good in 13, so I'm counting it. Best two year stretch of Bears offense sinse the late 80s. My hottest of Bears takes I've lately developed might actually be that in a different situation Trestman is at least an average coach. But that Bears situaition in many ways was destined to fail.
  19. I can't blame a man for having second thoughts about moving to Indy Chicago is home to head coaches who once spurred middling market jobs offers after accepting. It's why they call us the Second City, because we give second chances.
  20. I like McDaniels enough I think but I'll be skepitical if he gets too much power.
  21. *Sigh* They're gonna be pulling Noah out of retirement soon at this stage
  22. Yeah, go for the Deadspin/Defector or even Grantland/The Ringer-style mix of sports and pop culture; cool tangents and deep dives and lists/rankings and horsefeathers for both worlds. Stay away from being too sports-centric a la the dinosaur that is AM radio, and DEFINITELY stay away from the nightmare that is Barstool. Barstool Pizza Reviews but with Thick Onion Gravies instead.
  23. I guess they have some sort of hardship exemption and have signed Stanley Johnston.
×
×
  • Create New...