Walker was a below average 2B because he didn't have good range, Soriano was a below average 2B because he couldn't field the ball. Walker had 83 errors in 8272 IP at 2B, Soriano had 106 errors in 6752 IP at 2B. Again, Walker couldn't move very well to get to balls, moving him to first hides that. Soriano can't catch balls coming at him on the ground at high speed, moving him to first makes this significantly worse. Okay, so we'll eliminate any semblence of defensive value from Soriano. If "we're stuck with him", one would think we'd try and maximize that sort of thing. Where's he going to cost us more games with his "crummy defense", 1B or LF? The answer is 1B. And positional scarcity matters, especially when you're getting average to below average production out of guy you're trying to "hide" at 1B. Getting Lee to waive his no-trade clause is going to limit the teams we potentially deal with, probably significantly. That's going to ensure we don't get proper value for him. It's not about Lee, it's about the other teams knowing we "need" to trade Lee under that scenario. Seriously, the opposite of this is true. Have you ever run on dirt? On grass? Which is harder and less forgiving? Which do you think is better for a guy with leg issues, to track down fly balls and line drives on grass, or to be involved with nearly every play, often needing to use tight footwork and stretching to field throws? In this current baseball climate, how many players of Lee's caliber have been traded while they were still performing at a level that was appropriate with their contract? How many of them were traded away from teams that were trying to contend?