I struggle with how to interpret a lot of the pitchers that are in a similar category, some of whom have been discussed in the last week. I'll roughly call them guys with big stuff but at least one big flaw, probably control and possibly also lack of performance/endurance as a starter. This is a broad brush, but guys like Espinoza, Kohl Franklin, Cam Sanders, Luke Little, DJ Herz, and Max Bain all qualify to a certain degree. On one hand, pitching development has been turned on its head so much that there isn't a golden path guys have to walk down, and with innings being managed it's very possible that the reps they need to take that last step may just come later than they did 10 years ago. Plus with multi-inning relievers and piggyback situations becoming more of a norm at the MLB level, they don't need to be a 200 IP workhorse to be valuable. On the other hand, prospects fail as a rule, so guys who can't throw enough strikes to not walk 4-5 guys per 9 in South Bend or Tennessee are really unlikely to be key MLB contributors without a big change(and one that modern pitch dev hasn't solved as well as stuff). And when you think about potential rule changes that disincentivize big stuff/no control profiles and/or encourage SP endurance, the window of opportunity for them to be very useful at the MLB level seems small. And ultimately if MIRP is the ceiling for a guy I find it hard to get overly jazzed, because that profile is increasingly fungible. I named 6 of them above and none were in the Cubs Fangraphs top 10, for example. I'm not really driving at a specific point here, just sharing that I struggle with being happy and excited that the system has a lot of big stuff guys filtering through that show signs and stretches of dominance, but when I look at their performance as a whole and I don't really see too many guys I'm particularly hopeful of becoming rotation regulars(Kilian and Wicks are probably the 2, and notably they are in the aforementioned Top 10).