Cross quoting this because I'm getting a similar sense.
On top of the reasons mentioned there, I'd also add the prioritization of high minors returns at the deadline(3 of the 4 players and the 3 most valuable being at AA or above), and the roster churn that is mostly closing the door on some players' 2023 chances(first Rivas, then Bote, now Schwindel). What I'm currently grappling with is how intensely they plan on trying to hit the accelerator. 1) I'm not confident how aggressively they'll spend. On one hand, smart money would be on them not going all in to push up to the luxury tax line, especially if to do so they have to add 3 players with 4+ year deals. But on the other hand, the 2024 roster has little in the way of marginal cost increases, and could potentially be dropping almost 50 million of salary(Hendricks/Heyward/Happ) without an urgent need to backfill any of them(depending on how the high minors SP and OF look in 12 months). So if there was a season where some short term aggression could pay off, it's this one. 2) I think they'll try to stay net-zero with QO players, so if they keep Willson that means no Taillon, DeGrom, Bogaerts, Turner, etc. It could mean Correa + Thor + Willson though 3) I'm skeptical that they'll make a significant buy trade. That doesn't mean I don't think they'll explore trades that involve trading minor leaguers for major leaguers, but I think they're just getting comfortable with the level of depth, and if they make a trade it might be less about spending capital to get a clear cut star and more about getting a player who they feel good about breaking out(Spencer Turnbull? Mickey Moniak? Trevor Rogers? a 1B/DH?). An exception to this could be if a star comes available for extenuating circumstances. Maybe the Red Sox need to trade Devers like they did Betts and he's open to an extension and you jump on that because he's 26, maybe the Padres need to sell high on Machado to avoid luxury tax pain. When I add those things together, I feel like the most likely outcome is at the top of the market they'll do something similar to last year, they'll add a significant position player and starting pitcher. I don't think Willson is plan A for that significant position player, and they'll see if his market develops slowly and they can maybe get him on a more opportunistic deal(more Grandal than Realmuto) if that presents itself, but otherwise be a little more aggressive on shorter term deals. That could mean going a little higher in the reliever market for a late inning arm, or finding a bridge position player solution that's higher end than Villar/Simmons, or making the SP acquisition an older arm who will take a shorter term deal(Morton? Verlander? Kershaw?). So in the end it could look something like: Correa, Clevinger, Narvaez, Kiermaier, and a cohort of RP similar to this year. That's not gonna make them surefire playoff contenders, but the biggest weakness(1B/DH) is easier to fix through the market or just luck than most other spots on the roster, and with even a modicum of SP health you'll be staying in the race past the deadline and playing meaningful September games.