In comparison to Pujols, yes. No, in comparison to himself. "Past his prime", I think, is the term that we're using. You're missing the point. When comparing Ramirez and Rolen, you have to take into effect that Ramirez will likely improve and Rolen will likely plateau or decline because of their ages. The same holds true for Lee and Pujols, even though no one has really compared who will be better going forward(correct answer: Pujols). I don't necessarily buy into the idea of Derrek Lee suddenly declining because of his age. I think he's FOUND his prime. Some find it later than others. That's why this whole discussion of Ramirez' prime versus Rolen's prime is completely arbitrary, in my mind. We don't know when their prime was, is, or will be. There are exceptions(Luis Gonzalez, come on down), but when you're predicting performance over several years, assuming that someone is an exception isn't the way to go.