Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Fred Hornkohl

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    59,334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Fred Hornkohl

  1. Baka. Let's try to remember this is a family site. :wink:
  2. 39, actually. Hell.... I've been 39 for years, now. :wink:
  3. Even P.K. Wrigley knew that he could'nt hire Ernie Banks as manager because the day would come that he would have to fire him.
  4. Please include me. Go CUBS !!
  5. Hughes is excellent. Jack Quinlan & Lou Boudreau were better.
  6. there's also dodger stadium and angel stadium - neither bearing a corporate name. my point is, a team like the cubs does not have to put a corporate name on the ballpark to be one of the larger-revenue teams in the game. wasn't the Angels stadium called Edison Field for a long time? 6 years from 1997-2003. Back when I was in school..... 1997-2003 would be 7 years, no?
  7. Even Sammy Sosa ???
  8. Wow.... that IMB fella is about half smart !!
  9. I know you're speaking of SS. But I don't agree with you on CF and RF. RF for one, we have Murton. Who could have a decent year but he will not be Fukudome good. KFUKU has very good defense on top of better offense. CF you have Pie. And Pie is no guarantee to be anything. So if they do get Figgins I think it's a huge upgrade. 2B is the only one I can agree with you on. I was on Derosa's side ever since I heard of the trade. I'd like him to be our 2B. But if Roberts can put up Derosa #'s + 50 SB I'm still happy with that. So we'll have a somewhat black hole in SS (BTW, it's still much better than it has been in a few years). If we get FUKU, FIG, and ROB I think that's going to be a very good offense. Not only that, maybe we can finally get some stability in the line-up. Figgins could be a huge upgrade or a marginal one. His stats this year were great, but his OBP was fueled by his high BA. It really doesn't look like much changed except more of his hits fell in. If he settles back around a .300 average, which is likely his upgrade will look marginal for the cost. Does anyone know what his linedrive % and his pitches per AB? http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1580&position=3B Thanks! 4.0 pitches per AB, how does that compare to the average? NL average is about 3.75.
  10. I vote for........... E) This is the first sign of the Apocalypse, and life as we know it will cease to exist.
  11. Just heard the news. Man, this is great !!!
  12. I don't believe tickets to sporting events are deductible anymore. It's no longer a business expense? When did that change? Don't remember exactly. I think they've been phasing out "entertainment" expenses for quite a while now. As I think about it, it may be that sporting events and the like are partially deductible.
  13. I don't believe tickets to sporting events are deductible anymore.
  14. Back in the days when Ernie played shortstop...... a bleacher ticket cost $1.00, and the minimum wage was $1.00/hour. So, the folks on the lower end of the economic scale had to work an hour to attend a CUBS game. Today, the same kind of folks have to work 5-6 hours to attend a CUBS game, and it continues to rise. Baseball revenues and salaries are rising at a pace that greatly exceeds the rise in the cost of living. This is not news. It cannot continue forever, but it will continue as long as it can; i.e. until baseball hits that magic point of diminishing return.
  15. Cast dispersions ????? I think we know where to draw the line. :wink:
  16. Oh no...its not over...paper in St.Louis today listed him as someone the Cards might be interested in to replace Gritstein. Let's go Cards !!!
  17. You braggin' or complainin' ??
  18. Some guy posted it on baseball-fever's message board. When I was doing my research on my thesis paper about Cobb, Speaker, and Jackson in undergrad, I had to read on microfilm a good bit of those old sports columns and they are always hilarious. "the Yankees were as comfortable as a lamplighter in a gunpowder factory".... that's beyond outstanding. I really need to find a way to discover some of these. You make me more nervous than a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs !! :wink:
  19. http://the506.com/nflmaps/2007-07-CBS.html Are close enough to Oakland to be blacked out if they don't sell out ?
  20. Not to pimp LaRussa at all...but in every scenario there it says Z should bat 8th. This is the same Zambrano who's OPS exceeds only those of 4 backup catchers ???? 04/02 - 09/30 AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS BABIP Soto 54 12 21 6 0 3 36 8 5 14 0.389 0.433 0.667 1.100 0.486 Ward 110 16 36 13 0 3 58 19 22 23 0.327 0.436 0.527 0.963 0.393 Ramirez 506 72 158 35 4 26 279 101 45 65 0.312 0.369 0.551 0.920 0.318 Lee 567 91 180 43 1 22 291 81 70 112 0.317 0.399 0.513 0.912 0.365 Soriano 579 97 173 42 5 32 321 72 31 130 0.299 0.337 0.554 0.892 0.338 Floyd 283 40 80 10 1 9 119 45 35 47 0.283 0.370 0.420 0.790 0.313 DeRosa 502 65 147 27 3 10 210 73 58 93 0.293 0.370 0.418 0.789 0.343 Murton 235 35 66 12 0 8 102 22 26 37 0.281 0.352 0.434 0.787 0.305 Barrett 211 23 54 9 0 9 90 28 19 36 0.256 0.313 0.427 0.740 0.271 Pagan 148 21 39 10 2 4 65 20 8 33 0.264 0.297 0.439 0.737 0.315 Fontenot 234 30 65 12 4 3 94 29 21 43 0.278 0.333 0.402 0.735 0.330 Jones 452 52 129 32 2 5 180 66 33 66 0.285 0.333 0.398 0.732 0.325 Kendall 174 21 47 10 1 1 62 19 19 15 0.270 0.359 0.356 0.715 0.291 Theriot 533 80 142 30 2 3 185 44 48 50 0.266 0.325 0.347 0.672 0.290 Monroe 49 6 10 4 0 1 17 4 6 13 0.204 0.291 0.347 0.638 0.257 Cedeno 74 6 15 2 0 4 29 13 3 18 0.203 0.234 0.392 0.626 0.212 Patterson 8 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.250 0.250 0.375 0.625 0.400 Izturis 191 15 47 12 0 0 59 8 13 16 0.246 0.298 0.309 0.606 0.269 Pie 177 26 38 9 3 2 59 20 14 43 0.215 0.271 0.333 0.604 0.273 Zambrano 81 8 20 2 0 2 28 5 1 27 0.247 0.256 0.346 0.602 0.346 K Hill 97 7 16 4 0 2 26 12 8 18 0.165 0.231 0.268 0.500 0.182 Fox 14 3 2 2 0 0 4 1 1 2 0.143 0.200 0.286 0.486 0.167 Blanco 54 3 9 3 0 0 12 4 2 11 0.167 0.193 0.222 0.415 0.209 Bowen 31 3 2 1 0 0 3 2 4 13 0.065 0.167 0.097 0.263 0.111
  21. .... or, as my old bud Groucho was heard to remark, ..... "Why, I would never belong to a club that would have me as a member !!!"
  22. Well..... they have the same number of WS rings, no? :wink:
  23. How about factoring in the 2006 season as well - I hardly think that the numbers mean anything considering he hardly played at all in 2007. CUBS were 66-96 in 2006; 58-87 when Cedeno started, 8-9 when he didn't. - overall - w/Cedeno w/o Cedeno CUBS Oppt CUBS Oppt CUBS Oppt % baserunners driven in .200 .200 .202 .202 .191 .188 runs per baserunner .370 .388 .373 .393 .347 .347 runs scored per game 4.42 5.15 4.42 5.17 4.41 5.00 1st inning runs scored .710 .710 .717 .703 .647 .765 P/PA 3.68 3.88 3.67 3.88 3.72 3.87 Extra base hit % .323 .370 .326 .380 .293 .288 HR per game 1.025 1.296 1.048 1.324 .823 1.059
  24. Please...list these "facts" for me. * Offensive and defensive statistics (you can look them up). * The Cubs winning percentages with Theriot starting/Cedeno starting. All the "mathmeticians" that want to say that Theriot "sucked" in 2007 - I don't really know what to say. I am sure he will improve, and I am sure there was a reason why he started at SS most of the year. I know he was inconsistant at best offensively, and didn't play SS like Ozzie Smith. I can appreciate that the 2007 Chicago Cubs were a hell of a lot better than the 06 Cubs - and they got almost all the plays from SS because of Theriot. I watched a hell of a lot of games this season, and we definately had a better team when he was in the lineup. I love players like Theriot, and hope he is our SS/2B for as long as he plays like he did in 07. I'll bet you if you asked any member of the team they would agree with me too. The Cubs finished 65-62 with Theriot starting, and they were 20-15 when Theriot did not start. They were 8-6 when Cedeno started this season. If you want to make the winning percentage argument, you're arguing for Cedeno because his winning percentage was a lot higher than Theriot's. The Cubs scored 4.496 runs per game when Theriot started. They scored 5.17 runs per game when Theriot did not start. They scored 5.07 runs per game when Cedeno started. Great job, CCP..... but you did miss the effect of Cedeno's superior defensive skills................. pos Theriot Cedeno SS 54-47 6-4 2b 9-12 1-2 3b 2- 2 1-0 RF 0- 1 0-0 Total 65-62 8-6 note: there were 8 overlap games, where both Cedeno & Theriot started. The CUBS went 3-5. In the 29 games where neither man started, the CUBS went 15-14. - overall - - Theriot - - Cedeno - CUBS Oppt CUBS Oppt CUBS Oppt % baserunners driven in .189 .180 .186 .179 .188 .145 runs per baserunner .364 .351 .360 .347 .357 .288 runs scored per game 4.64 4.26 4.50 4.17 5.07 3.50 1st inning runs scored .704 .451 .622 .323 .786 .214 P/PA 3.74 3.80 3.75 3.81 3.80 3.84 Extra base hit % .341 .354 .332 .352 .417 .309 HR per game .932 1.019 .937 1.031 1.000 .643 Cedeno started 14 of the teams' 162 games, or 8.64%. The CUBS shutout their opponents 10 times during the season..... Cedeno started 5 of those 10 games.
×
×
  • Create New...