Oh... now you're one of the crazies. Nah; the OL was already a critical weakness, and now it's somehow going to be improved to manageable by swapping in spare parts? Sorry, it doesn't work like that. Couple that with the terrible, terrible and easily countered playcalling and they're likely to get trounced by any quality team that didn't back their way into the playoffs. Yeah, it's football and anything can happen, but the Bears have looked like hot garbage in the two losses they've had against genuinely good teams this year...there's losing and then there's getting destroyed. Cutler being in there against the Niners wouldn't have made much of a difference; they're simply going to have to face too many good teams in the postseason for them to have a real chance to do much of anything. Their offense is simply too flawed and scattershot to pull it off. Understood. But think of it this way. The Texans cheap-shotted Cutler, got him out of the game and eeked out a win. Then the 49ers cleaned up with no Cutler. Yes, the Bears are flawed. But with Cutler, it's possible -- though unlikely -- that they could challenge a good team in the playoffs. I'm not going to throw this team away after seeing them without our best player against 2 of the top teams. I want to see them with our best player against those teams. Then I'll admit defeat if they lose. Do people honestly think the SF game would have been much different with Cutler in there? That line was collapsing almost instantly left and right. No, you're right. They killed us and Cutler wouldn't have mattered. I think we had a good shot against the Texans with Cutler, in the 2nd half.