My original point was that Hendry generally makes good value trades - i.e. he rarely overpays in his trades and rarely gets less than good value for his players. The DeRosa trade, in my opinion, fits those parameters exactly. I think we might agree on that point. The conversation has also branched off, however, into whether trading DeRosa in the first place was a good idea. I'm less convinced on that point, but still feel that if the follow up plans had been better then, yes, the idea of trading DeRosa was a good one. The follow up moves (starting Fontenot, signing Miles) haven't worked, though.