http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/11754873/tampa-bay-rays-manager-joe-maddon-exercises-opt-clause-leaving-team I was little surprised to find no post here, but it's very quite these days. There is another Insider article where Bowden speculates that the Cubs will be Maddon's next stop.
I don't remember the exact number of games or criteria, what does 50 games of MLB time this year do to Baez's rookie status? Not saying I care at all about the status with respect to the decision to call him up (it should factor 0% of the decision), just curious if this makes 2014 his official rookie year.
This hurts the Cubs' chances of signing him (because of the draft pick compensation issue) more than it helps it imo I think draft pick compensation has been pretty much a non-starter for an FA with this FO, even moreso for a post-30 guy like Lester. Removing the QO probably ups his price, but the Cubs are more likely to pay X + that price increase than X + a pick and pool money. This was my thought. Money is what the Cubs want to play with and I suspect player acquisition that purely costs money and not talent in any form is the first choice. I don't expect 2014/2015 off-season to be the ramp up, but I still hold out some hope the FO wants to start the Bryant/Baez/Soler years with a better MLB roster and a splash so that the pressure isn't all on those guys and Rizzo/Castro. Lester is going to get too many years but is still top of my list.
Isn't that the textbook gamble on guys like Arrieta (top rated stuff lacking control)? Not many work out but when it does it usually leads to above average results.
Actually I think you can say that. Every year 'everyone' (the analysts and fans I presume) chides the GMs for terrible contracts and yet those terrible contracts do change the bar anyway. All that matters is the GMs. It's different with trades because no agents are involved to reinforce the market value precedent, but I could still see GMs pivoting on established trade comps in recent years as a hard negotiating point.