I'm not saying a man had to be a great hitter to instruct it. But I DO question the choice of such a one demensional type hitter to be chosen over all others, especially concidering the obvious controversy. If you could just take a second to explain to me how a "one dimensional hitter" racks up a career OBP of almost .400 that'd be spectacular. Pretty easy...being pitched around and intentional walks...is he gonna teach 'em how to get intentional walks? He DAM sure can't teach them how to shorten up to push runners over, or how to drag bunt for a hit. Tell me again why he will be a better hitting coach than say, Sandberg or Hernandez. If you take away the 150 IBB he received in his career he'd still have a .374 career OBP. Pretty DAM good for a "one dimensional hitter." As a matter of fact, that's a full 30 points higher than Sandberg's career OBP of .344. Which, by the way, if you take out HIS IBB, drops all the way down to .333. Oh, and as for the "going the other way" thing, while he was very much a "pull" hitter in his career:
I Split G PA AB H 2B 3B HR RBI
I Pulled-RHB 870 1160 1150 600 78 0 233 518
I Up Mdle-RHB 981 1409 1387 496 61 0 194 449
I Opp Fld-RHB 442 499 488 112 18 2 28 85
I Unknown Loc 754 1135 1105 247 66 0 76 209
Sandberg wasn't much different:
I Split G PA AB H 2B 3B HR RBI
I Pulled-RHB 736 1042 1037 502 81 1 111 250
I Up Mdle-RHB 888 1529 1515 498 63 13 70 248
I Opp Fld-RHB 392 459 453 146 21 7 2 49
I Unknown Loc 621 1003 977 184 60 14 9 109