Roast
-
Posts
18,663 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Roast
-
?? The Packers have played in cold weather before. Brett is awesome in cold weather in Lambeau. Did you miss the Packers game at Soldier? The Packer's fans didn't miss that game. It just didn't count because of the following reasons that I've heard so far from the idiotic fans of the green and urine gold: 1) They just didn't want anybody getting hurt in the cold. 2) They got caught looking ahead to the playoffs. 3) The game really didn't mean anything (even though it did), so they didn't try as hard. 4) If it hadn't been for the packer's punting game, they'd have won. 5) The Bears just got lucky. Again. Any other day, the packers would have won. Believe me. I live in Wisconsin, so I've heard it all. Yeah, and believe me, I've heard all of the Bears' excuses on why they sucked this year. That's what happens when you live in the area of a team you don't like. Again- Don't try and be rational. Remember - packers fans can't do that!
-
to be fair, he was found not guilty. Don't let that silly little fact get in the way of rationality.
-
OF COURSE, I SAID IT WILL COME DOWN TO RUNNING THE BALL!!!!11!!1?!!?111!!! Look at what Grant did yesterday, Favre managed the game, he didn't win it, Grant did. Yes, if GB is down and they have to pass to get back into it, those weather conditions will play a factor!!!!11111111??????//?//?/////// You mean all that trouble he had throwing 3TDs? And running the ball? That hasn't been a problem either. Grant was the best RB in the league not named LDT since week 8. I never said weather wouldn't play a factor I just said the packers are historically good in the frigid temps
-
Amen, brotha! My hatred of Green Bay and everything that is the packers knows no bounds. Actually, I don't mind the packers much. It's their fans I can't stand. They have got to be--without a doubt--the most obnoxious breed of sports fan around. They are incapable of any rational thought when it comes to their team. They get diarrhea just thinking about how "great" their football team is. Want to know how I know this? Green Bay is the toilet paper capital of the world. Look it up! You know how annoying we find it when Sox fans say things EXACTLY like that about us. Yeah it doesn't sound any more intelligent or any less annoying when it comes from packer-haters.
-
?? The Packers have played in cold weather before. Brett is awesome in cold weather in Lambeau. http://www.packers.com/news/stories/2007/12/23/1/ Not the last time he was in frigid conditions. 12MPH isn't a strong enough wind. You mean Favre had ONE bad game in conditions that he said (prior to the game) were the worst conditions he had ever played in!?!??!??! HOLY CRAP STOP THE PRESSES. Did you happen to see the conditions yesterday afternoon? It was like a white-out at one point. They did okay.
-
Ahh gotcha. It's nice to have an insider among us.
-
So...which teams would you like to see that fit that criteria?
-
That should have been caught, but to be fair, it has to be HARD to catch a ball today. plus black guys are not conditioned to playing in the snow [/dustybaker] The houston astros would kick ass today. I found it to be ironic that the Houston Aeros minor league hockey team had 2 black guys on it... Awesome. Anyway - On to Dallas (or at home against the giants, but I doubt that)
-
That should have been caught, but to be fair, it has to be HARD to catch a ball today. plus black guys are not conditioned to playing in the snow [/dustybaker] The houston astros would kick ass today.
-
Seriously? His dreads are awesome. he looks like hes getting ready to play the role of an orc from LOTR :lol: Which is awesome. Bigby, too.
-
That should have been caught, but to be fair, it has to be HARD to catch a ball today.
-
Seriously? His dreads are awesome.
-
And they gave the packers a terrible spot which was only reversed after a challenge. They have made bad calls on both sides. Yes but that call can be challenged. Obvious DB interference can't be. Even the announcers are basically saying they could be called but aren't and the seahawks just have to deal with it Uhm...and? Are you saying that the refs are favoring the Packers because they are only making bad calls against the packers if they can be challenged and missing calls on the seahawks that can't be challenged? I am pointing out that the only objection that you can make is a bad spot that was reversed. However, the seahawks are having to overcome calls that can't be challenged and that are just as obvious and are happening often. That's fine. But what you said is "I guess we know who the ref's are going for." If they were really favoring the packers intentionally would they be making bad calls against the packers too? It just amounts to bad luck that the bad calls against the seahawks weren't reverseable and those against the pack were. Anyway - This game is getting really fun to watch with all this snow. To be fair, an inaccurate spot happens on 75%+ of plays. True. But so do missed holding calls. Point is, the refs are not costing Seattle this game.
-
hahaha wow.
-
You're down by 22 with less than a quarter left and you've got a 4th and 2 and you punt? Good game plan.
-
I wouldn't worry about it. Well I wasn't staying up at night over it, but I just wondered.
-
:lol: I love that every time they show Holmgren more and more snow just keeps piling on his head. Lmao, Favre just threw a snowball at someone. EDIT: and Driver got him back at point blank range :lol:
-
THAT would be the best TD celebration ever.
-
haha, this game is hilarious to watch through this snow.
-
RYAN GRANT!
-
And they gave the packers a terrible spot which was only reversed after a challenge. They have made bad calls on both sides. Yes but that call can be challenged. Obvious DB interference can't be. Even the announcers are basically saying they could be called but aren't and the seahawks just have to deal with it Uhm...and? Are you saying that the refs are favoring the Packers because they are only making bad calls against the packers if they can be challenged and missing calls on the seahawks that can't be challenged? I am pointing out that the only objection that you can make is a bad spot that was reversed. However, the seahawks are having to overcome calls that can't be challenged and that are just as obvious and are happening often. That's fine. But what you said is "I guess we know who the ref's are going for." If they were really favoring the packers intentionally would they be making bad calls against the packers too? It just amounts to bad luck that the bad calls against the seahawks weren't reverseable and those against the pack were. Anyway - This game is getting really fun to watch with all this snow.
-
Wow, It's really coming down right now.
-
And they gave the packers a terrible spot which was only reversed after a challenge. They have made bad calls on both sides. Yes but that call can be challenged. Obvious DB interference can't be. Even the announcers are basically saying they could be called but aren't and the seahawks just have to deal with it Uhm...and? Are you saying that the refs are favoring the Packers because they are only making bad calls against the packers if they can be challenged and missing calls on the seahawks that can't be challenged?
-
TOUCHDOWN!
-
And they gave the packers a terrible spot which was only reversed after a challenge. They have made bad calls on both sides.