San Francisco didn't do anything yesterday apart from what Tony Romo gifted them. I wasn't impressed. I'm not really panicking on the Bears, but really, the same thing could be said of the Bears....Buffalo didn't do anything yesterday other than what the Bears gifted them. Wouldn't that be a good thing (relatively speaking) and a point in US's favor, then? If the Bears had to gift-wrap it to lose by 3, that's a lot better than them playing as well as they should and losing. Same goes the other way for what US is saying (although jersey is right that they didn't HAVE to do anymore). For me its that there was a continuation of the Bears habit of shooting themselves in the foot repeatedly the last 2 years. All my evidence is anecdotal, so I'd be willing to change my view on this but it sure seems like an increase over the Lovie regime. By this I'm referring to bad penalties at inopportune times (yesterday Marshall gets a 15 yarder tacked on to the post interception), turnovers while the Bears are driving or in scoring range (happened twice yesterday), breakdowns in critical situations (Conte in week 17), boneheaded mental errors (Bears standing around with a live ball that was picked up by the Packers for a critical TD), and questionable coaching decisions (Trestman opting for that long FG in Minnesota instead of getting closer and losing the game). Again, I know Lovie's Bears had their share of these, and every team does, but it seems like there are more with this squad....or maybe its more noticable because they are losing more because of them. Anyways, with a really tough schedule, the Bears needed to win this. It's great that they probably have better performances in them, but they also have superior opponents coming up.